I could care less about global warming. I do see a danger that could end in millions of lives lost. A logical conclusion to this whole argument is that there are too many people, and there is a solution to that. Have we moved beyond that insanity? Probably. If so, then I have no problem with cap and trade. It would destroy the third world up and comers and give us a fighting chance. Which I assume is the real agenda for Europe who's economy is being destroyed and now us.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Global warming hoax fools millions
- Thread starter wilburbear
- Start date
Quote from Illum:
I could care less about global warming. I do see a danger that could end in millions of lives lost. A logical conclusion to this whole argument is that there are too many people, and there is a solution to that. Have we moved beyond that insanity? Probably. If so, then I have no problem with cap and trade. It would destroy the third world up and comers and give us a fighting chance. Which I assume is the real agenda for Europe who's economy is being destroyed and now us.
ahh yes ....
the truth will eventually be exposed.... this was all about CULLING THE HERD
The ANTI-IRONY ...
The COOLAID DRINKERS COMMIT MASS SUICIDE
Here's a suggestion... Begin With The End of Yourself
Quote from slacker:
The problems you won't read about in U.S. main stream media:
1. The scientest 'peer-reviewed' each others work.
2. They e-mailed each other on how to coordinate their efforts to explain results that did not agree with their 'story line'.
3. They destroyed data that did not agree with their agenda.
4. Now they cannot produce either the data or the methods to reproduce their experiments used to draw their conclusion.
They did not carry out a hoax; but a fraud and a crime. These scientist belong in jail for fraud used to obtain public funds for research.
Good post.
My favorite is the fact that they INTENTIONALLY threw away the original, source data.
I wouldn't trust any of the global warming crowd, even if they told me there was something more than 5lbs. of ice at the North Pole. They have now been discredited as a source of data. I would trust a reliable scientist on this issue.
EVERYONE, INCLUDING the pro-hoax posters on this thread, agree with their move to fire their head of climate research in England.
Quote from wilburbear:
Good post.</b>
Ummm... no it wasn't.
<b>My favorite is the fact that they INTENTIONALLY threw away the original, source data.
Ummm... no, they didn't. If you're talking about the tree ring data, it was published 10 years ago in Nature. It was peer reviewed and rejected as erroneous.
Quote from FeenixRizin:
Let me ask you a direct question Vhen....
IS THE GLOBE WARMING?????????????????
EVEN YOUR CRACKPOT "SCIENTISTS" HAVE ADMITTED IT IS NOT
Yes, this topic is, (and really always has been), intellectual masterbation for us "skeptics","deniers", "naysayers", "flat-earthers", "anti-science", etc, etc, etc, etec
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_question
still waiting for the answer to my question ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_question
I guess it is still not open for debate.
Quote from bigdavediode:
Ummm... no, they didn't. If you're talking about the tree ring data, it was published 10 years ago in Nature. It was peer reviewed and rejected as erroneous.
Ummm... time to grow up and stop being naive.
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/282951
Quote from wilburbear:
Ummm... time to grow up and stop being naive.
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/282951
these people need to be lined up and shot
I just hope that the right shows some resolve, and actually prosecutes these people.
BigDave, Vhen, Ricther ... will be forgiven. They are simply stooges and useful-idiots.
Quote from wilburbear:
Ummm... time to grow up and stop being naive.
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/282951
The researchers did not use certain tree ring data post 1960 because it was not properly calibrated to instrumental data. There has been much hoo-hah about this "throwing out" of data when really it is the instrumental data that matters, not the proxy data.
And it was released and studied a decade ago, it's not even new:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v391/n6668/abs/391678a0.html
A very good summary of the issues of fraud and criminal intent:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/12/understanding_climategates_hid.html
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/12/understanding_climategates_hid.html
And the CRU/IPCC reconstructions have been counterfeited for the express purpose of hiding that very fact.
After all, the stakes are enormous â perhaps trillions of dollars and unquestionably every Americanâs personal liberties. Tomorrow, over 20,000 delegates from 193 nations will gather in Copenhagen to craft an agreement which would not only force American power consumption to levels equal to those of about 1910, but would also have us pay reparations for an imaginary âclimate debtâ weâve accumulated by building the worldâs greatest economy of all time. That debt is based on the amount of CO2 our financial growth has purportedly pumped into the atmosphere, which, according to the conclusions of the IPCC, based largely upon reports from the CRU, has selfishly imperiled the planet by inducing climate change.
Of course, asking Americans to pay reparations based on the claim theyâve done harm to other nations by spoiling the climate is like asking me to pay damages to my neighbor based on his claim that he canât sell his house because my great-grandmotherâs ghost is haunting it.
As many have known and Climategate has proven, either would be equally preposterous.
But at least belief in ghosts is only marginally inspired by fraud.
"a good summary"
..............
These fucking people deserve tp have golf balls driven straight into their temples
..............
These fucking people deserve tp have golf balls driven straight into their temples