Global warming hoax fools millions

Quote from bigdavediode:

Okay, look, this is just getting embarrassing. Launching a weather balloon is meteorology.

That’s right. The data from the balloon (with all other forms of observations) will eventually go into a climate model. Very important for atmospheric modeling.

Scientists who study the Earth's climate is climatology. They are different.

No Shit. Climatology: study of climate, scientifically defined as weather conditions averaged over a period of time.

Climatologists are involved with the study of climate (s). They obtain their data from geology, paleontology, oceanography, and meteorological data. Other methods such as dendrochronology also give clues to climates at various times in Earths history.


Meteorologists become TV weathermen, and then sign silly Republican online anti-global warming petitions, signing alongside dentists.

I became a trader. TV weatherman are journalists. I'm not a republican (or democrat), and have not signed anything. I am simply opposed to having my life drastically altered without a true consensus on a very important issue. I don't buy that there is consensus until all sides have been given equal time. Opposition is being routinely vilified. I question whether enough data from the mentioned sources is even a fraction of the amount needed to provide accurate extrapolations in climate models.

Diode, you do yourself a disservice by assuming others lack knowledge simply because they don’t go into detail, or agree with you. I don’t really disagree with you on man’s role in warming. I disagree with how it should be approached. You are right about one thing. This is getting embarrassing.
 
A note of interest about a source oft quoted.

Realclimate.org (was) hosted or created by:
Environmental Media Services.

Environmental Media Services founded in 1994 by Arlie Schardt.
(Schardt was with Al Gore's 88 campaign and his 00 run.) EMS apparently ended in 2005 and is now Science Communication Network

http://www.sciencecommunicationnetwork.org/

EMS had close ties to Fenton Communications.

Moveon.org is/was one of Fenton Comm's many progressive clients.

http://www.fenton.com/pages/home.htm

Absolutely no chance of bias, right? Let's get all sides into the debate.
 
Quote from Thunderdog:

If you can accept the fact that price trends are not necessarily straight-line, but a series of fluctuations with an underlying bias, then why is it such a stretch for you to accept the same phenomenon when it comes to climate?


Exactly my point. Climate change will occur abruptly and naturally, warm or cold. And nothing can be done about it.

The Arctic was once subtropical. Yes, no ice at the North Pole. The earth has been completely covered in ice, completely free of ice and somewhere in between without human activity.

It will be interesting to see you humans try to optimize the weather to your liking.

After this Inconvenient Ruse fizzles, people will doubt real science when real danger approaches.
 
Quote from FightTheFuture:

Exactly my point. Climate change will occur abruptly and naturally, warm or cold. And nothing can be done about it.

The Arctic was once subtropical. Yes, no ice at the North Pole. The earth has been completely covered in ice, completely free of ice and somewhere in between without human activity.

It will be interesting to see you humans try to optimize the weather to your liking.

After this Inconvenient Ruse fizzles, people will doubt real science when real danger approaches.
Wow, you've figured this thing out all on your own, relying on nothing more than a few thought experiments. Splendid.
 
Quote from Thunderdog:

Just as the "debate" regarding evolution and creationism ("Intelligent Design") continues, eh? :p


Yep, it does seem to be the same morons who state that the debate is over on both of these issues.
 
Quote from ilikefox es:

Yep, it does seem to be the same morons who state that the debate is over on both of these issues.

Scientists who study in Intelligent Design labs have a conflicting theory to global climate change, that God is making CO2 concentrations increase via angel contrails (incorrectly called angel farts by laymen.)
 
Quote from bigdavediode:

Nobody's mad at you, we just think you guys as a group are completely and utterly wrong and detached, you know, like believing uncited things as if science hasn't progressed since 1924.

So do you guys believe in the Keeling curve, or is that just some liberal dogma?

So there is proof that the CO2 levels have to be rising due to man's activities?? That is your giant leap of faith....
 
Back
Top