The IPCC says different. Who to choose, who to choose...
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Global warming hoax fools millions
- Thread starter wilburbear
- Start date
The IPCC says different. Who to choose, who to choose...
Quote from bigdavediode:
Good point, I bet climatologists, the IPCC, the IAC, International Council of Academies of Engineering and Technological Sciences, the EASA, the NRC, the European Science Foundation, the AAAS, the Federation of American Scientists, World Meteorological Organization and the Royal Meteorological Society never thought of that.
You should forward this new information to them immediately. [/B]
And do all these agencies believe that our pollution will have more impact on climate then these natural occuring events? And how will they prevent these events? And aren't some of these the same agencies that 30 years ago predicted the opposite because of the same? (Ice age coming because of pollution.) Are they blaming humans or stating the obvious. By the way, lastest I've heard, planet cooled in the last 10 years.
And how many of these agencies are NOT gov funded? I've heard that prof Gray and other dissenters have lost funding because they wouldn't get on board (not to mention those individuals who get death threats against them for having a differing opinion about it). So fight the hype, lose your funds.
You missed my point. I'm not saying man can't influence the climate in some ways. Man contributed to the Great Dust Bowl with farming techniqes, for example. I'm saying it won't matter. That's what they arent telling you. Maybe 50 years from now, when you're sitting around wondering why winters are so long and cold, you can ponder the other side of the equation. The side given by scientists who have been effectively silenced. How bout a real two sided debate on the issue before imposing draconian measures? Is that too much to ask?
Actually, when you think about it, the pollution should stop eventually. The side pushing global warming as man made also claims fossil fuels will eventually run out.
Problem solved.
Global warming alarmism could turn out to be the communism of the 21st century, a man-made religion that captures the attention of the liberal elites but leads to terrible suffering.
It should be clear to those who have not been indoctrinated that it represents a clever attempt to use environmental guilt to gain control over national economies.
It should be clear to those who have not been indoctrinated that it represents a clever attempt to use environmental guilt to gain control over national economies.
Quote from wjk:
How bout a real two sided debate on the issue before imposing draconian measures? Is that too much to ask?
How bout that?
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.SenateReport
Quote from AAAintheBeltway:
It should be clear to those who have not been indoctrinated that it represents a clever attempt to use environmental guilt to gain control over national economies.
It would appear that the indoctrination runs deep, and the attempt to impose guilt very effective.
Quote from wjk:
And do all these agencies believe that our pollution will have more impact on climate then these natural occuring events?
That depends on what events when, but over time, yes.
And how will they prevent these events?
They won't.
And aren't some of these the same agencies that 30 years ago predicted the opposite because of the same?
Nope.
(Ice age coming because of pollution.) Are they blaming humans or stating the obvious. By the way, lastest I've heard, planet cooled in the last 10 years.
And you heard wrong. Here's what NASA says:
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt
And how many of these agencies are NOT gov funded?
Tell me.
I've heard that prof Gray and other dissenters have lost funding because they wouldn't get on board (not to mention those individuals who get death threats against them for having a differing opinion about it). So fight the hype, lose your funds.
Yeah, but you also heard that global mean average temperatures had gone down the last ten years, so you're probably just wrong again.
You missed my point.
I'd love to know what it is.
I'm not saying man can't influence the climate in some ways. Man contributed to the Great Dust Bowl with farming techniqes, for example. I'm saying it won't matter.
Ah, so we're influencing temperatures, but it "doesn't matter." But volcanoes do?
That's what they arent telling you.
Darn "them!" Probably liberals!
Maybe 50 years from now, when you're sitting around wondering why winters are so long and cold, you can ponder the other side of the equation. The side given by scientists who have been effectively silenced. How bout a real two sided debate on the issue before imposing draconian measures? Is that too much to ask?
What climatology journal are you reading that doesn't have debate, I wonder.
Actually, when you think about it, the pollution should stop eventually. The side pushing global warming as man made also claims fossil fuels will eventually run out.
Is it? I hadn't read anything about fossil fuels "running out" in any climatology journals, actually.
Quote from wjk:
How bout that?
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.SenateReport
That's a hilarious senate "study" from the Republicans:
"Inhofe's "scientists" include economists, the retired, TV weathermen, mathematicians, amateurs and industry spokespeople
Bigfoot discovered by two guys who just happened to own a Bigfoot merchandise shop.
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1544880720080815
The political left threatens "global warming" as something real, and just happens to have the adjustments to your lifestyle that they've been espousing for years. Bigger government to check your lawn mower emission documents, and everybody riding a bike, wether you like it or not.
If you don't understand that, you're not going to be able to comment on the nuances of this issue.
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1544880720080815
The political left threatens "global warming" as something real, and just happens to have the adjustments to your lifestyle that they've been espousing for years. Bigger government to check your lawn mower emission documents, and everybody riding a bike, wether you like it or not.
If you don't understand that, you're not going to be able to comment on the nuances of this issue.
Quote from wilburbear:
Bigfoot discovered by two guys who just happened to own a Bigfoot merchandise shop.
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1544880720080815
The political left threatens "global warming" as something real, and just happens to have the adjustments to your lifestyle that they've been espousing for years. Bigger government to check your lawn mower emission documents, and everybody riding a bike, wether you like it or not.
If you don't understand that, you're not going to be able to comment on the nuances of this issue.
Actually Bush admits that man-made global warming is real, as does McCain.
So it's not those evul liberuls.
Quote from bigdavediode:
That's a hilarious senate "study" from the Republicans:
"Inhofe's "scientists" include economists, the retired, TV weathermen, mathematicians, amateurs and industry spokespeople
Lets say it can be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that we have created the current global warming, and it's not a normal cycle in 4 billion years of Earth history.
What are you willing to do? Are you willing to fork over control of your life to the powers that be? Are you willing to make these sacrifices while China and India don't? Lead be example, right? Do you believe goverment can fix global warming? Gov can't fix anything. And the UN? Give me a break. If it's real, what do you propose?
It seems you're debating me from a climate viewpoint. I agree with the warming theory. That's been proven. I am not convinced that man is as big a factor, though certainly some. Show me a study that proves man is the sole cause.
I'm debating from a political point of view. I think gov hopped on board, hyped the issue, and now sees a golden opprotunity to impose their will. I don't think that will solve any pollution issues. Do you? Is Gore walking the walk he talks?