Global warming hoax fools millions

They don't have enough history of ice at the north pole to know whether this is unusual or not really... they interpret ice cores wrongly as has been pointed out to them too..... in 1924 Scientific American reported that Polar Bears were running out of ice.... it's just pretty muchly meaningless all this global warming krap but it will lead to $45 Billion in infrastructure buildout around the world, the loans to build it all, and a carbon tax levied by the UN so that is likely the reality of the situation.

Al Gore's personal finances are getting a very, very healthy boost from all this bullshit too, nobody reports on that much, or Harry Reeds adultry either, why do they bury the truth all the time like that? [Hint: it's about the UN Tax and $45 Billion in loans and infrastructure and the press is the PR outlet for the Democrats]

I kind of want to take the first cruise that goes straight to the North Pole without ice breakers, it would be sort of historic, not as cool as flying into space but nonetheless it would be cool....
 
Quote from wilburbear:

Don't get mad at us. Just change your mind about this hoax. Then you won't have to get defensive about carrying a banner that someone else has put in your hands.
More...

Nobody's mad at you, we just think you guys as a group are completely and utterly wrong and detached, you know, like believing uncited things as if science hasn't progressed since 1924.

So do you guys believe in the Keeling curve, or is that just some liberal dogma?
 
If the enviro's are going to be so dishonest even about such simple facts as whether there is a concensus, why on earth would anyone believe their poppycock science? I treat you to a bit of the "other" side, which you'll never see in the msm, below.

---------------------------------------------------

"32,000 scientists dissent from global-warming “consensus”

"Al Gore claims that “the debate is over,” and that there are only a “few” remaining “skeptics.”

“In Ph.D. scientist signers alone, the project (which disputes global warming-my edit) already includes 15-times more scientists than are seriously involved in the United Nations IPCC project. The very large number of petition signers demonstrates that, if there is a consensus among American scientists, it is in opposition to the human-caused global warming hypothesis rather than in favor of it,” states Robinson. Signers include more than 9,000 Ph.Ds."

“Not only did they dispute that there was convincing evidence of harm from carbon dioxide emissions, they asserted that Kyoto itself would harm the global environment because ‘increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the earth.’”

printed at :
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, Inc.
A Voice for Private Physicians Since 1943

http://www.aapsonline.org/newsoftheday/0026
 
Quote from ilikefox es:

...printed at :
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, Inc.
A Voice for Private Physicians Since 1943

http://www.aapsonline.org/newsoftheday/0026
More...
"A 1966 article in the New York Times described the organization as an "ultra-right-wing... political-economic rather than medical" group, and asserted that historically some of its leaders had been members of the John Birch Society.[6] According to the JBS website, several members of the JBS National Council are associated with the AAPS."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_American_Physicians_and_Surgeons

Big surprise. You guys don't even know how to operate without subterfuge, do you?
 
Quote from Thunderdog:

"A 1966 article in the New York Times described the organization as an "ultra-right-wing... political-economic rather than medical" group, and asserted that historically some of its leaders had been members of the John Birch Society.[6] According to the JBS website, several members of the JBS National Council are associated with the AAPS."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_American_Physicians_and_Surgeons

Big surprise. You guys don't even know how to operate without subterfuge, do you?
More...


www.timeswatch.org describes the new york times as a liberal newspaper. Big surprise. You guys don't even know how to operate without subterfuge, do you.

btw, you weren't quite able to discredit the info on global warming itself, were you? lol

You warming nuts are slowly being shown for the frauds that you are.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top