Global Warming: For Experts Only
- Thread starter julianVGS
- Start date
You mean like every expert on earth?
No expert denies it. None.
Are you smarter on this than all the experts?
I clearly need to make more of an effort.
1. you don't even bother to pretend to look for science. you just make a vague non responsive statement about almost nothing. robust... has nothing to do with my statement.
I spoke to the divergence between instrument data and many of the tree ring proxies.
among other issues...
this chart is from future currents agw nutter al gore sponsored website.
the data maybe robust in your world... but the divergence is significant.
Now agw nutters say the tree rings stopped working.
But, instead of thinking the trees are broken occam's razor might lead one to wonder if perhaps man is messing with the instruments while the proxies are still working.
Still pretending to know more than every publishing climate scientist on earth huh?
None deny it. Makes you look like a fool, but we know that you are just lying.
You're just incredibly stupid. Not really a dickhead.
CO2 is not pollution.
Warming might not be bad for the planet.
We are rebounding off historical very low co2 levels.
With an expanding population more co2 might be the only way we can feed them.
Whether it good or bad we don't know.
Whether we are warming outside natural variation is not known
Whether we are accumulating more co2 because of man is not known.
CO2 levels could be tied to ocean temps.
Ocean temps could be warming naturally.
Particularly because of underwater vents and volcanoes.
You are sounding alarms about co2 levels but you don't even know if our proxies vs our instrument temps are being measured accurately.
Everything going back a few hundred years is based on proxies.
Many of the proxies don't match up with current temps. The proxies say we are cooler.
"CO2 is not pollution.
Warming might not be bad for the planet.
We are rebounding off historical very low co2 levels.
With an expanding population more co2 might be the only way we can feed them.
Whether it good or bad we don't know.
Whether we are warming outside natural variation is not known
Whether we are accumulating more co2 because of man is not known.
CO2 levels could be tied to ocean temps.
Ocean temps could be warming naturally.
Particularly because of underwater vents and volcanoes."
All of the above are lies. You are a liar.
And you think that by now that you would ONE publishing climate scientist that agreed with you.
You surprised me. I was unaware that you were capable of finding a new chart."CO2 is not pollution.
Warming might not be bad for the planet.
We are rebounding off historical very low co2 levels.
With an expanding population more co2 might be the only way we can feed them.
Whether it good or bad we don't know.
Whether we are warming outside natural variation is not known
Whether we are accumulating more co2 because of man is not known.
CO2 levels could be tied to ocean temps.
Ocean temps could be warming naturally.
Particularly because of underwater vents and volcanoes."
All of the above are lies. You are a liar.
And you think that by now that you would ONE publishing climate scientist that agreed with you.
there 10s of thousands of skeptical scientists and I am a skeptic.
so co2 is not helping green the planet...
which could not help feed more people?
how do you know that co2 levels are not tied to the temp and any excess co2 is not off gassed or synced?
how do you know that the oceans are not warming naturally.
you are clearly not interested in science or the truth.
here are 1350 peer reviewed papers supporting skeptical arguments.
and there are 30,000 skeptical scientists... they agree with me.
I don't say man man co2 does not cause warming... I say there is no peer science showing it. (only failed models.)
http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html
so co2 is not helping green the planet...
which could not help feed more people?
how do you know that co2 levels are not tied to the temp and any excess co2 is not off gassed or synced?
how do you know that the oceans are not warming naturally.
you are clearly not interested in science or the truth.
here are 1350 peer reviewed papers supporting skeptical arguments.
and there are 30,000 skeptical scientists... they agree with me.
I don't say man man co2 does not cause warming... I say there is no peer science showing it. (only failed models.)
http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html
"CO2 is not pollution.
Warming might not be bad for the planet.
We are rebounding off historical very low co2 levels.
With an expanding population more co2 might be the only way we can feed them.
Whether it good or bad we don't know.
Whether we are warming outside natural variation is not known
Whether we are accumulating more co2 because of man is not known.
CO2 levels could be tied to ocean temps.
Ocean temps could be warming naturally.
Particularly because of underwater vents and volcanoes."
All of the above are lies. You are a liar.
And you think that by now that you would ONE publishing climate scientist that agreed with you.
Well, see, there are only so many relevant facts. In the face of huge unending piles of falsehoods and red herrings from denier morons like you, they must get repeated.
Oh you are becoming so boring. In addition to being a liar. Still can't come up with ONE publishing climate scientist that denies man made global warming. OTOH....
American Chemical Society
"Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from human activities, and potentially a very serious problem." (2004)4
American Geophysical Union
"Human‐induced climate change requires urgent action. Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years. Rapid societal responses can significantly lessen negative outcomes." (Adopted 2003, revised and reaffirmed 2007, 2012, 2013)5
American Meteorological Society
"It is clear from extensive scientific evidence that the dominant cause of the rapid change in climate of the past half century is human-induced increases in the amount of atmospheric greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), chlorofluorocarbons, methane, and nitrous oxide." (2012)7
American Physical Society
"The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now." (2007)8
The Geological Society of America
"The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2006), and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) that global climate has warmed and that human activities (mainly greenhouse‐gas emissions) account for most of the warming since the middle 1900s." (2006; revised 2010)9