Global Macro Trading Journal

It's nothing? That's why the US still does not have a single efficient electronic transfer system alike Hong Kong, China, Japan, UK and others? You are a total dreamer man.

Yes, it wont be easy but of course they can comply with money transfer rules.
There are literally thousands of banks and non-banks that do that.

FB has managed to track and target almost 30% of the planet. Creating a payment system with KYC and that bans certain places is nothing.

Of course, it wont be 'true' crypto, and they will hand over all their info to governments (and this might be why they would have no problem with this) but this will introduce billions to people to the world of 'crypto'. They will make transfers and get familiar with it. They will be able to deposit this libra (and this is a speculation on my part but I dont see why not) at crypto brokers and buy BTC. Yes they can do that now with cash but they have no idea what crypto is, once they learn and see how it works, to get involved in the BTC momentum trade will be a lot easier.
I say BTC makes a new ATH within 12 months. $30-$40K is a resonable target after the ATHs
 
What is a convexity market? You mean a supply/demand imbalance? Convexity is the wrong term. It only plays a role in non-linear products such as options. Stocks, futures, cryptos are all linear products. OMG, could there be a reason you have 12000 posts and 400 likes? You are totally talking out of your ass.

But its funny this BTC. I was talking to a buddy and told him that BTC was due a correction at 10K, I thought the same at 11k, 12k, 13k and 14k. At 14K it finally came and yet it was still 2K higher than where I originally thought it was due for a correction.

This is TYPICAL in convexity markets that are running. Now, did I ACT on what I thought? Not in a million years, I didn't sell a single satoshi. Had I acted I would have been punished hard by my skepticism. But this is what a lot of the skeptics miss out, there are certain PERSONALITY TRAITS that fit well with a market and some that don't. In a convexity market, the traits are different from what it takes to do well in say, bond investing. Being a moronic skeptic that second guesses everything, who tries to sell and buy lower, who is afraid to chase the price up, etc are all bad traits in this market.

I learned a lot of lessons in 2017 trading BTC, now I will use them to my advantage
 
You are a tool, or should I say the product. You seriously have no clue what you are talking about. Care to take a quick look at his bio? And rest assured he is financially equally doing well, just that he does not sell bullshit to sheeples like you:

What have you achieved in contrast? Trading 0.001748 bitcoin day in day out? What a loser.


After receiving a BA in political economics at Bocconi University, Milan and a doctorate in international economics at Harvard University, he became an academic at Yale and a visiting researcher/advisor at the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Federal Reserve, World Bank, and Bank of Israel. Much of his early research focused on emerging markets. During the administration of President Bill Clinton, he was a senior economist for the Council of Economic Advisers, later moving to the United States Treasury Department as a senior adviser to Timothy Geithner, who in 2009 became Treasury Secretary.


And BTW, Roubini has little to none of the traits that I see as beneficial for BTC trading. He is just a loser economist, a one hit wonder really. If you want to see read good commentary on this space look for the top guys in Silicon Valley. They understand a lot better, even if only intuitively, this space. I havent had the time to read Andreesen's, Wilson's comment on libra but I bet they are very different from roubini's
 
OTC stock trader? What is that even? If your orders hit the exchange matching engines then you DON'T trade OTC. Do you even know what OTC means? It is off exchange trades, exclusively the demain of block or facilitation equity desks at banks and hedge funds.

I dont believe BTC is manipulated in a large scale, here and there? Sure but these days BTC is a $100B-$200B "stock". It trades $10-$30B dollars a day. I have seen a LOT of manipulation in my life (I'm primarely a OTC stock trader) and I have serious doubts that something so big and liquid can be manipulated for more than a day or two. It would take a huge amount of money, and you cant "corner the float" easily
 
Yes and this has been confirmed by many sources. There is a lot of shuffling of order flow from bids to offers by the same market players who look to inflate volume.

It's been claimed that up to 95% of BTC trading is fake: https://www.wsj.com/articles/most-bitcoin-trading-faked-by-unregulated-exchanges-study-finds-11553259600

So it's a thinly-traded asset, with no "anchor" whatsoever to any concept of fair value (unlike a stock with earnings) or economic supply/demand (unlike a commodity with producers and end-users), and no regulation or oversight at all. What's the reason I can't set up two wallets and bounce the same BTC between them a million times?
 
Yeah but there is a difference between wash trading and pegging an asset to a fake (non-equilibrium) value. I see wash trading in penny stocks all the time, it makes the stock appear strong, it shows up in people's trading scanners, it gives technicians and even non-technicians people confidence that the move is real but what makes the manipulators succeed is not that. Its the fact that they control most of the float. If they didnt, that float (supply) would come out and kill the move

Its a manipulator worst nightmare, he buys like crazy to get the thing to some higher non-real price and sellers show up and kill the move (taking advantage of the ridiculous price). That's why they make sure they control the float before the move.

If BTC were trading at some absurd unreal price, real sellers would show up and sell until the price got to its true equilibrium because the float is not tightly held. Its supply and demand 101

Furthermore a lot of manipulation involve "squeezing the shorts". There is not a lot of shorting happening in BTC, the futures (to my knowledge) is small compared to the real market. I'm sure there might be some gaming around futures expiration, for a few hours or even a day or two, but the manipulation claimers make it seem like BTC's real price is $100 and it only at $11k because of this manipulation, that is ridiculous

Well, BTC crashed by 75% in two months, and as of yesterday was up 40% in a week before crashing 20% today. So the concepts of equilibrium and real vs. unreal prices have a pretty fuzzy meaning in this arena. One thing's for sure, which is that an "asset" with this sort of regular extreme volatility is never going to be widely seen as store of value, or a reasonable component of any investment portfolio. I think it's perfectly fair to say that aside from a very small base of transaction and money-transfer activity (much of it involving criminals or black money), the BTC market and volume consists entirely of tape-painting and speculative buyers hoping to sell higher.

In any case, my point is that IMHO it's impossible to reliably forecast BTC's value over timeframes longer than a few months. In two years it's as likely to be at 3,000 as at 40,000. IMO the only +EV way to trade or invest in it is by playing short-term momentum.
 
Last edited:
In any case, my point is that IMHO it's impossible to reliably forecast BTC's value over timeframes longer than a few months.

This is a big reason why I'm long. BTC is like a call option. You describing something that has a lot of uncertainty. Uncertainty benefits options. The more we dont know, the more I want to lean towards being long (with an adequate position size). The idea of shorting BTC is so crazy to me (other than in a daytrade with a stop), and most traders would agree with that. If the short side is so horrible, then the long side is what makes sense
 
.... What's the reason I can't set up two wallets and bounce the same BTC between them a million times?

There's a tremendous cost to you on what you're describing with no benefit to anyone except the bitcoin miners. You can setup hundreds or even thousands of wallets (they're absolutely free), but each transaction (bitcoin transfer from one bitcoin address to another) requires a transaction fee (or the miner would not include/confirm your transaction in the blockchain). I made a transaction yesterday with medium priority and paid about 14,000 satoshis (100 million satoshis in one bitcoin) which is about $1.50 at current bitcoin price.

The more transfers you perform on your thousands of wallets at one time, the more the bitcoin network gets clogged, the higher the fees will be for you (and everyone else), during late 2017 when the bitcoin network was very active, a very low priority transaction I made cost me $35 in tx fees, but I paid it as it was an important transaction for me, otherwise, most people switched to another cryptocurrency for payment to a merchant for goods or services.

Others were paying more than $50 in fees, so your theoretical million transactions would cost you 10's millions of $. Sure, go ahead and make the bitcoin miners rich(er)...
 
From the Libra's paper:
"The reserve is the key mechanism for achieving value preservation. By fully backing each coin with a set of stable and liquid assets (described later) and by working with a competitive group of exchanges and other liquidity providers, users can have confidence that they will be able to sell any Libra coin at or close to the value of the reserve at any time. "

As I mentioned, this is like an ETF of currencies and short-term government bonds that can be transfered easily between people. Its a cool idea and its similar to an idea I wrote about in this journal in the past, which is to measure one's networth against a basket of currencies instead of the USD or (in my case) the BRL. Measuring against several currencies (plus gold and silver) is more robust against black swans, while measuring your self in just currency induces the investor to take significant black swan risks.
FB is essentially making an IMF drawing rights type currency. I would like to know more details about this currency, in terms of the mix of currencies and etc but if I use this in the future it will be to store value during crypto bear markets. Right now the options are Tether, which can blow up at any second, and other suspect stable currency cryptos. Or fiat cash deposited in crypto brokers, which are super risky. Of course, I can keep the fiat in a bank and then wire as needed but that takes away the flexibility of being able to deploy it at any second. It would be great if this Libra is added to the hardware wallets that exist out there
 
No it's not in the developed world where a domestic currency is much more stable than a basket of currencies that includes emerging market currencies. This means that the coin is subject to value fluctuations which completely defeats the purpose as store of value and means as payment.

It does suit the backers of this project because it hedges their exposure across the globe but is a huge disadvantage for someone who wants to make a payment to a domestic recipient.

From the Libra's paper:
"The reserve is the key mechanism for achieving value preservation. By fully backing each coin with a set of stable and liquid assets (described later) and by working with a competitive group of exchanges and other liquidity providers, users can have confidence that they will be able to sell any Libra coin at or close to the value of the reserve at any time. "

As I mentioned, this is like an ETF of currencies and short-term government bonds that can be transfered easily between people.
 
Back
Top