The idea is that the back end (10 and 30y) will rally if the Fed keeps on being hawkish as the markets will start to price in its all a policy mistake/probable recession. The nice thing about bonds is that you get paid to hedge. When you say 'hedge if it incorrect' im not sure if you mean put options, stops or shorts. I try to do all of them as my asset allocation method tries to incorporate many different ideas and systems.How do you feel about your 10y exposure? What are your thoughts on increasing equity exposure and hedge it if incorrect instead of having an allocation to 10y?
There is still weakness in the market in the sense that prices are bellow the 200MA. To me, this is a more established indicator than short-term price action. A few weeks back markets were too oversold to sell, but now if anything they are a bit overbought AND bellow the 200MA AND late in the short and long-term debt cycles. The tape does feel like its going higher but this is more of a strategic move. The tape can change in an instant. Furthermore I will still own plenty of long equity, just not as aggresivelly as beforeI think you are making a sub optimal decision derisking and here's why: You are selling into a rally from lows when you could have sold highs earlier by a few months.
What if the recent rally didn't happen? That would be weakness in the market and you could be making a smart decision by derisking. But since the market rallied strongly, it's an indication of strength.
It's not a rational decision if you are seeing strength and still derisking. If you truly believe in your positions, you should be adding to them.
Not a criticism, just an observation.