A while back I heard about this great theory that explains the 'fake news' phenomena. The rise of Google and Facebook (and other social media) and the giant amount of ad revenue they generate has really hurt businessnes like magazines, TV, newspapers. As a result, they had to start to distort, exaggerate, put things out of context, sensationalize things in order to get people's attention. Who is going to turn on their TV or read a newspaper when they got more interesting things to see on Youtube or Instagram? This lead to the rise of fake news, as a result, these days if you want to know what is real, what is going on, its hard to do it through news outlets. They distort things to a point that its hard to get a complete picture by reading the news.
This TSLA thing, there was a great example the other day
"After Musk’s Twitter claim on Monday that “investor support is confirmed”to take Tesla private, the California State Teachers’ Retirement System, which owns about 213,000 shares as one of the largest institutional investors in Tesla, said it had not been contacted by Musk or the firm before the announcement.". CALPERS wouldn't even quality as a 1% holder (for that, you need over 1.5M shares of TSLA) but somehow it was brought as 'evidence' for what the article was arguing
It seems to me that now more than even one should rely on relationships with other great investors/traders and less and less on 'information' one gets from news sites in order to get a complete picture about something, because the amount of distortion from the internet is so large. It wouldn't even surprise me to know that articles do 'lawyer' shopping. That is, if they want to claim some illegality happened, they will keep calling lawyers until one says its a violation of the law what happened. They will ignore the ones that didnt say that. All in the name of producing the biased piece that will get folks to stop their youtube video and read an article. And the rise of fake news seems to make the Mr Market bipolar disorder worse, at least in some instances. Its quite sad really
This TSLA thing, there was a great example the other day
"After Musk’s Twitter claim on Monday that “investor support is confirmed”to take Tesla private, the California State Teachers’ Retirement System, which owns about 213,000 shares as one of the largest institutional investors in Tesla, said it had not been contacted by Musk or the firm before the announcement.". CALPERS wouldn't even quality as a 1% holder (for that, you need over 1.5M shares of TSLA) but somehow it was brought as 'evidence' for what the article was arguing
It seems to me that now more than even one should rely on relationships with other great investors/traders and less and less on 'information' one gets from news sites in order to get a complete picture about something, because the amount of distortion from the internet is so large. It wouldn't even surprise me to know that articles do 'lawyer' shopping. That is, if they want to claim some illegality happened, they will keep calling lawyers until one says its a violation of the law what happened. They will ignore the ones that didnt say that. All in the name of producing the biased piece that will get folks to stop their youtube video and read an article. And the rise of fake news seems to make the Mr Market bipolar disorder worse, at least in some instances. Its quite sad really