Its interesting that you broght this up because when I truly realized how powerful convexity was (which only happened after I read Anfragile for the 4th time and thought more about it), I thought about buying Bitcoin. This thing looked like a bubble in the charts at $100, now its at $1500. That's what convexity does, its exponential, skepticism is stupidity. Its a shame that there is no ETF or a liquid way to get involved otherwise I would be long them. At the very LEAST, they work as insurance for gold. If digital money is the future, gold as a store of value will lose its attractiveness and I own some gold, so having all of that money be down 50%+ wont be fun. Digital coins are even more convenient than gold. They look unstable now because they are repricing but once they finish that, they will trade like EUR, BRL, TRY, JPYs. up and down 1% and that's it. Governments are blocking/banning them now, but the same was true with gold at many points in historyThanks for your thoughts as always Daal.
I think your discussion about convexity is particularly relevant to Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies in general. Intuitively, I think it's crazy that Bitcoin has a "market cap" of $26 billion, and that the total "market cap" of cryptocurrencies is $49 billion, but the same arguments could have been made last year at much lower values.
It's entirely possible that I could be completely wrong about my cryptocurrency skepticism, and that cryptocurrencies today are like buying Internet stocks in the mid 1990s. Sure there might be a lot of failures (eg. the cryptocurrencies outside the top 10), but for all I know Bitcoin / Ethereum / Ripple / Litcoin might go up tenfold in the next decade.
.
If you compare the market cap of digital coins with gold, one can see the potential that they have.
Gold wasn't always the king, they had seashells, rocks and other things before it became the store of value that it is now. If digital coins are the next big store of value, they would be doing exactly what they are doing now, going exponential as they get repriced higher according to their usefulness
If finance skeptics kept a P&L of skeptiscism as 'short sales' almost all of them would be bankrupt as a result of bitcoin. Despite the fact that they were right 90%+ of the time in their other skepticisms, thats the power of convexity and that's why I want to become more of an optimist every year
Last edited: