Very interesting different perspective
http://www.businessinsider.com/david-bianco-high-profit-margins-sustainable-2012-5
http://www.businessinsider.com/david-bianco-high-profit-margins-sustainable-2012-5
Cheap? The front end of TIPS is a punt on oil/gasoline and who knows what happens there. I daresay that 2y TIPS at -1.5% real yield isn't really that cheap, unless you think oil's gonna roof it. The only thing that's cheap in TIPS is the 30y area, but that's on a relative basis.Quote from Daal:
If you are talking about USD investment only. I'd say TIPS are quite cheap
Quote from Martinghoul:
Cheap? The front end of TIPS is a punt on oil/gasoline and who knows what happens there. I daresay that 2y TIPS at -1.5% real yield isn't really that cheap, unless you think oil's gonna roof it. The only thing that's cheap in TIPS is the 30y area, but that's on a relative basis.
Yeah, Ole Bill's story is, basically, about going long the line in the attachment (I used a const maturity 7y breakevens). Problem, for me, is still the fact that it is mostly a long oil/gasoline trade (and becomes increasingly more so with time). Furthermore, also due to the funding component, it's really much too volatile for my taste and isn't really at any particularly compelling levels. Again, the really absurd thing in TIPS is that the equivalent number for the 30y maturity is only arnd 15bps higher. Simplistically, that's 20+ years worth of extra inflation risk premium for free.Quote from Daal:
Well, in a fixed income portfolio its all about relative basis isn't it. I'm referring more to 5-10y tips
"Assuming the Fed is successful in its targeting efforts and the CPI averages 2.35% over the next five years, a buy-and-hold position purchased at par and held to maturity in five-year notes (using a nominal yield of 0.85%) would return 4.25% in nominal terms and -7.5% in real terms. Tii Apr 17 would return 6.25% in nominal terms if purchased at market price and held to maturity. Therefore, despite having a negative real yield, Tii Apr 17 would outperform nominal Treasuries by 2%. The actual rate of inflation will vary, which will impact the real return of a security. "
http://www.pimco.com/EN/Insights/Pages/TIPS-for-Value-Investors-Whos-Afraid-of-Negative-Yields.aspx
Quote from Martinghoul:
Yeah, Ole Bill's story is, basically, about going long the line in the attachment (I used a const maturity 7y breakevens). Problem, for me, is still the fact that it is mostly a long oil/gasoline trade (and becomes increasingly more so with time). Furthermore, also due to the funding component, it's really much too volatile for my taste and isn't really at any particularly compelling levels. Again, the really absurd thing in TIPS is that the equivalent number for the 30y maturity is only arnd 15bps higher. Simplistically, that's 20+ years worth of extra inflation risk premium for free.
Incidentally, Ole Bill's PIMCO is the 800lb gorilla in the TIPS mkt. Things get very dysfunctional when the Total Return fund is in the mkt with some ginormous flow.
Quote from darkhorse:
Be afraid...
http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2012/05/03/986401/greek-elections-be-afraid-be-very-afraid/
Sire, firstly, what does PCE have to do with TIPS? TIPS cashflows are based on the headline CPI-U, rather than anything else. If you look at the realized CPI-U fixings, you will perforce conclude that they are, first and foremost, about oil/gasoline. That's reality, regardless of the various theoretical notions, such as the Fed target etc. For UST to be better value than TIPS, you don't need anything like Japan. Roughly, you just need CPI-U to realize less than 2.15% over 7 years, for whatever reason, using the 7y example from above.Quote from Daal:
What you mean its a energy trade?If the Fed hits their target of 2% PCE, based on historical relationships to the CPI, TIPS will provide an additional return. For USTs to be a better value one must think the Fed will fail Japan style