Quote from Martinghoul:
Yep, it's a reasonable guess... Some of the new ECB measures also didn't apply to this tender (more eligibility of collateral, decline in the required reserve ratios, etc) , but will apply to the one in Feb. So it's possible that the one in Feb will actually see more participation.
Quote from Daal:
But there is a risk the stress tests will force the company to raise equity at current prices. Although I'm not sure they will include litigation losses which is what matters
Quote from Daal:
The biggest risk seems to be liquidity problem driving the company to some kind of gov bailout in the form of FDIC guarantee of assets. Stockholders might be hurt in that case
I'm thinking of setting up as follows
Long BAC+Short XLF+ Long $2.5 puts for Jan 2013.
Quote from dhpar:
i like this (in fact I have a similar relative value position on).
the bit i do not understand is why you want to waste cash on these puts (at around 70% vol). it is either "too big to fail" or it is not "too big to fail"- take your pick...
Quote from Martinghoul:
ralph, this is interesting, no?
http://www.businessweek.com/news/20...ear-of-mbs-reits-as-homeowners-refinance.html
I would like to know when the right time to get involved is.
But that's a short with a pretty punitive negative carry... I am thinking of getting long if it gets sufficiently cheap, having briefly discussed it w/some mtge peeps.Quote from Daal:
Whoever is still long these scam companies need to have their head examined. 'low for longer' is a total mainstream view(as opposed to a few years back where it was like Hatzius versus the world). Now with this refinance issue they might be even good shorts
Quote from Martinghoul:
But that's a short with a pretty punitive negative carry... I am thinking of getting long if it gets sufficiently cheap, having briefly discussed it w/some mtge peeps.