Quote from Daal:
The nytimes article saying 'This could be 2008' marked the 'effective' bottom for the Aug collapse
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/11/b...comparison-to-2008-crisis.html?pagewanted=all
The close that day was only slightly higher then the actual bottom. I accumulated some losses leading up to those days by buying the decline too early. I thought the panic was ridiculous and kept buying, I recoup the losses I end up having a smaller loss of 1.5%
Its funny how this is not 2008 anymore. Bottom line here is this, the actual news(fundamentals) are almost irrelevant in a short-term basis, what matters is how the emotions are playing out. Yet I see it over and over again people saying 'This decline will only stop once politicians do the right thing', this MIGHT be true on a long-term basis(we could see further 10-15% collapses in the future because politicians are screwing up) but in a short-term basis it doesn't mean shit
In case anyone hasn't noticed, shares have been in a powerful bull run since August 9. The swoon in markets was a 2 week event and ended nearly a month ago - about the same time as the Fed announced 0 rates for the next 2 years.
Everything I bought (too early off course) in late July/early August - mostly big cap stuff, but also more NLY and TUP - is nicely higher now. Not tooting my horn - these shares are in the buy and hold account for at least 10 years while math and the power of compounding works its magic. I could care less about their short-term price action (in fact, like Buffett, I'm hoping for prices to go down, so my reinvested divvies buy more shares). I'm just trying to point out the markets have moved on, the analysis should as well.
I would also note STOXX has removed underperformers SocGen, Unicredit, Intesa Sanpaolo, and Nokia from the Stoxx 50, and replaced with stronger stocks. Indexing sucks. Read up on survivorship bias.