Quote from fickletrader:
Is this because our funding costs would go up in the form of higher interest rates, thus attracting inflows? If so, I also disagree on the basis that non-paying paper makes poor collateral, which is the biggest thing going for the dollar because payments are taken for granted.
Also, you perceive the treasury deadline to be much further in the future than the mainstream view. What will be cannibalized to extend it out?
There are a few scenarios. A couple are described by here by Carney and Morici. Yes, there are some legal issues, but nothing appears set in stone, and Geithner has made his career twisting laws so that the Fed and the Treasury could do what they need to do to keep the game going.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/43899646
Now Carney writes for entertainment purposes, but I've seen the exact same scenario laid out in more academic fashion elsewhere. This was just the first link I happened on.
The bottom line is this deadline is a made-up crisis. Why the Bammer and Geithner have played this game of chicken is a political matter I can't get my head around. Maybe some of his critics are right and BO is another Herbert Hoover.
In the meantime, we remain in one of the most balls to the wall bull markets ever. Why are people's panties in such a bunch? A downgrade by the moronic ratings agencies would be meaningless other than providing a nice buying opportunity. If anything is going to derail it, it's going to be a crack-up of the insanity in China or Italy/Spain falling apart, not what whether there is some stupid, kick-the-can meaningless fucking deal between the Bammer and the Boner this month (remember Gramm-Rudman? how'd that one work out!!!)
