Quote from Butterball:
I never understood this type of argument. I never allow an underlying macro gut feeling dictate what trades I am allowed to enter. If a trade doesn't work out I get out at a loss, no matter how high my gut level conviction was. Either the trade works or it doesn't.
What benefit do you derive from being 'convinced' of your position after you entered it?
Quote from Butterball:
You mean the outlandish 1% annual carry?

No obviously I understood exactly what you meant.Quote from dhpar:
you obviously didn't understand it.
let's say you have 10 trades on and something big unexpected happens - markets start to be volatile, your risk goes up.
you need to cut some trades immediately - which ones do you exit? those with more or less conviction? or do you keep all and hedge?
i thought you do trade for a living but now i doubt it. how do you enter your trades? based on technicals only? and if the move does not get confirmed you exit? that's certainly not a global macro i understand it but rather a worldwide punting...
the saying "if the trade does not work i exit and vice versa" sounds a catchy phrase for newbies but trading/investing is a bit more complicated...you can never be 100% right with your timing!
If you look historically some of the best (or rather 'fastest payoff') trades were made by betting against the direction of carry at the right time, especially when combined with outlandish PPP overvaluation.Quote from gmst:
But let us say trade takes 6 months to work out, you would be paying 0.5% carry, if you are trading for an institution fine....but if you are running your own account and you use a 7 leverage, you would end up paying 3.5%.
Quote from Butterball:
If you look historically some of the best (or rather 'fastest payoff') trades were made by betting against the direction of carry at the right time, especially when combined with outlandish PPP overvaluation.
Not the case for EURCHF obviously so it's a bit OT, but I'm patiently waiting for AUD to implode over the next couple of years even though the carry may then still be substantial. It that comes to pass it'll be a beautiful opportunity.
What pressure on the SNB? As far as I know, the only guy who's on the warpath is Christoph Blocher, who's a bit of a right-wing nutter. His bark is generally a lot worse than his bite and, if I am not mistaken, he's not taken altogether seriously in Switzerland. Moreover, I think that for Blocher, just like for other right-wing leaders across Europe, the ccy issues just offer a convenient platform to push their traditional agenda. I am pretty sure that other than Blocher, there's pretty universal political, business and popular support for the SNB policy. Obviously, this all with the caveat that I am short CHF and that the situation may change if Europe gets a lot worse.Quote from Daal:
Does anyone have more close to the ground information in the political situation there?The vast majority of politicians I see want a WEAKER currency not stronger one so I'm curious if this supposed pressure on the SNB is significant or if its coming from a few Ron Paul types
If if its coming from the media or parts of the population, then its irrelevant because CBs think they are smarter than them and will have no problem ignoring them for long periods. Basic Central Banking 101
Quote from Martinghoul:
What pressure on the SNB? As far as I know, the only guy who's on the warpath is Christoph Blocher, who's a bit of a right-wing nutter. His bark is generally a lot worse than his bite and, if I am not mistaken, he's not taken altogether seriously in Switzerland. Moreover, I think that for Blocher, just like for other right-wing leaders across Europe, the ccy issues just offer a convenient platform to push their traditional agenda. I am pretty sure that other than Blocher, there's pretty universal political, business and popular support for the SNB policy. Obviously, this all with the caveat that I am short CHF and that the situation may change if Europe gets a lot worse.