Quote from hermit:
I made a point against the flawed moderation policy which you yourself admit was correct. I don't know why you would equate this to your worth as a moderator, it's not your fault that you weren't trained as a moderator or were handed guidelines which only leads to reactionary seat of the pants moderation.
Any critcism will look as attacks/abuse if you give it a political slant, which was obvious when you agreed with Piker about the whole liberal nonsense.
Quote from OPTIONAL777:
"because I know that you don't absorb much"
That is a personal attack, right?
So you are not a flawed moderator, you are flawless, right?
Consequently if someone accused you of being a flawed moderator, it disturbed you, right?
I mean, if you did have flaws as a moderator...you would just admit it, right? You wouldn't become defensive about something you actually are, right?
Ohhh, of course make a pop up book, no doubt it would become a best seller...
Quote from Hombre:
Never even watched his show ? Then you must know what you are talking about .
Quote from Ivanovich:
If they accused me of being flawed because of something I did, it would not disturb me. I merely reacted because I had nothing to do with the original attack. We all have flaws as humans. Many times, what we perceive to be flaws in others are just things we don't like about that particular individual. When many people see these aspects as flaws, then it is perhaps time we review ourselves to examine whether they truly are flaws, and not just dismissible because we believe we are right.
Such is the case with your trolling, and hence my comment regarding you not absorbing much. Your style is that you are never wrong. Pride, if you will.
