Quote from Badeco:
From my first days trading I never thought that trading would be an easy adventure, I knew that it would take a lot of losses, stress, humility and patience. But after over 3 years full time I would have expected that I would have "graduated" on trading and would be able to generate consistent profits, but that is not yet the case...
I would appreciate hearing from experienced traders, in particular those that have been on this business for a longer period of time and I know they aren't many, whether it has been for them such a hardship to succeed in trading or maybe it is simply that you can not really consistently win the trading game?
Thanks for your comments.
I have been at the "game" for thirty years, last 23 years day trading, only thing that has changed is ease of getting in and out, charting, average age has gotten much lower of trader, margins much lower. But the barcharts have not changed, one might say the ranges have gotten larger, but bar charts make same patterns. I have wheat charts going back to 1920's, they make same patterns as yesterday.
People lose for a host of reasons, usually poor discipline, but most often their inability to backtest over mountains of data. And for those who can't code, your testing have to be well defined. Too many have this "need" to either be right or make a boatload of money. Those of us who have put in the years, concentrate on totally different designs of methods to trade. I don't seek methods that will give the most profits, I don't seek more signals.
We grow up hearing "More, More, More", but in day trading, having to pay commisions, it really is "Less, Less, Less".
People make methods that are often too hard and too many. Find one method for entry, then the important aspect of trading are the 30 plus rules on how to manage the trade after you are in. And some of those rules are when to bypass your signal. I get some signals to enter but cause of the volitility is too great, I pass on them.
Too many try to make the losing trades either become winners or a way where the signal does not come up at all. I learn so little from losing trades, I study why the winners were profitable.
Too many have an all or nothing approach, either make or lose, how bout the "tie", find all the ways a trade can become a tie. Most of my profitable trades become this way very fast, they don't "hang" around. Did you do testing to discover how long till your trade hit a target? Did you test how long before it became a loss? So if after so many minutes of doing nothing but drifting, why not try to get out at breakeven? At what point can you bring your protective stop up to breakeven? Do you have rules on how to trail your stops, where are your targets?
Vendors, Trading schools, chat rooms, if you are going to PAY these people, ask them for brokerage statments, if you pay them without brokerage statements-like jumping out of a plane wondering if there is a parachute or dirty underwear on your back.