Giuliani gets to the constitutional question on presidential indictments

It’s not a political thing as you make it out to be. This is real nasty stuff being investigated here and it has to do with the corruption of a pillar of our way of life - free and fair elections.

You see this as some made for tv bullshit but it’s bigger and more important than you think.

As for simplifying justice down to “big kills”, again, you watch too much tv. I have told you this before, these are serious people who will not be deterred by rhetoric.



Mueller is the one who is now confronted with the fact that it is "not just a political thing."

He is required to put a case together and move it through the legal process or to stand down or to just go in circles. He can do that right? Okay, well get going then.

Oh, I see. He is going to just dump a pile of dirt on to Congress after/if the dems are elected and let them try for impeachment. Yup, and you are the one who just reminded me above that "this is not a political thing." Viewers might want to get their chuckle of the day out of that.
 
How it looks should not be the standard by which a decision should be made in this matter. Trump has admitted he obstructed justice in his writing of that Don Jr memo. We are here.

Although it does look bad for the DOJ to defy or alter a standing internal memo to pursue an indictment against a sitting president it should not compel inaction nor should action be definitely pursued. It just is simply time to figure this out.

As to the process being a burden on the president to effectively carry out his duties, the congress and states saw fit to adopt the 25th amendment and there is room in there for seemless transition if the president should be incapable.
A legal opinion is not simply an internal memo. It is not simply standard operational procedures. That is their opinion of the law.

In other words, they started with the following: What does the law say?

Their answers to the question are the legal opinions.
 
Last edited:
A legal opinion is not simply an internal memo. It is not simply standard operational procedures. That is their opinion of the law.

In other words, they started with the following: What does the law say?

Their answer to the question are the legal opinions.

That’s a whole other DOJ’s opinion of the law from decades ago when facing different circumstances. This is not settled law.
 
Mueller is the one who is now confronted with the fact that it is "not just a political thing."

He is required to put a case together and move it through the legal process or to stand down or to just go in circles. He can do that right? Okay, well get going then.

Oh, I see. He is going to just dump a pile of dirt on to Congress after/if the dems are elected and let them try for impeachment. Yup, and you are the one who just reminded me above that "this is not a political thing." Viewers might want to get their chuckle of the day out of that.

Mueller may put his case together, he may not. It all depends on what Trump does.

Saying it’s a “political thing” because there are congressional elections every two years is kind of a weak argument. You may as well say “solar thing” because the sun rises every morning.
 
Mueller may put his case together, he may not. It all depends on what Trump does.

We just covered that. It definitely does depend on what Trump does. If Trump walks into his perjury trap he will put a case together. Otherwise he can't make the kill.

Nice process. Just as with the Clinton witch hunt. If Starr could get Bubba to commit perjury, he had a case. If not, well then he didnt have anything else.
 
That’s a whole other DOJ’s opinion of the law from decades ago when facing different circumstances. This is not settled law.

Then Mueller needs to get going, and we dont want to see any hocus pocus from Mueller trying to weasel out by saying department rules prohibit him from indicting. As you say, it is not settled, so he needs to either move the case or be known as one who did not have the goods and had to put his tail between his legs. A witch hunter who could only get side players on bullshit.

Go for it. Pay no attention to departmental opinions. Full speed ahead.
 
Then Mueller needs to get going, and we dont want to see any hocus pocus from Mueller trying to weasel out by saying department rules prohibit him from indicting. As you say, it is not settled, so he needs to either move the case or be known as one who did not have the goods and had to put his tail between his legs. A witch hunter who could only get side players on bullshit.

Go for it. Pay no attention to departmental opinions. Full speed ahead.

Mueller does not need to move the case because you’re impatient or Trump’s legal team is slow walking it. Mueller needs to conduct a complete and thorough investigation. That’s all.
 
Mueller does not need to move the case because you’re impatient or Trump’s legal team is slow walking it. Mueller needs to conduct a complete and thorough investigation. That’s all.


Okay, Maybe in another year then. Giggle.

And Mueller is in the driver's seat here- not Trump. If Mueller had the evidence Trump could not slow it down. It is Mueller's problem that he needs to have Trump to step in the doo-doo for him to have a case.

You and your ilk were in a cheerleading/gloating mode when Mueller and Weisman were the kicking doors in in the middle of the night with Mannafort and surging forward to squeeze Flynn even though the interviewing agents said they did not think he lied.
I guess the going-gangbusters routine has hit a slow period. Yup. More time needed. Just as Ken Starr needed more time. Bubba was charged with a crime that was committed 18 months after Starr was appointed. Thanks for reminding us that witch hunts take time. Why doesnt Weisman just go over to the white house in the middle of the night and kick the door in and arrest Trump. Oh, I see. Doesnt work that way when you dont have a case and the defendant has a full team of lawyers.

Also, we know Mueller is busy trying to hastily put together a case against the russian company where the judge has ordered Mueller to be ready for trial. Mueller should have thought of that when he indicted them but thought they would never actually defend themselves. Oops!
 
Last edited:
Okay, Maybe in another year then. Giggle.

And Mueller is in the driver's seat here- not Trump. If Mueller had the evidence Trump could not slow it down. It is Mueller's problem that he needs to have Trump to step in the doo-doo for him to have a case.

You and your ilk were in a cheerleading/gloating mode when Mueller and Weisman were the kicking doors in in the middle of the night with Mannafort and surging forward to squeeze Flynn even though the interviewing agents said they did not think he lied.
I guess the going-gangbusters routine has hit a slow period. Yup. More time needed. Just as Ken Starr needed more time. Bubba was charged with a crime that was committed 18 months after Starr was appointed. Thanks for reminding us that witch hunts take time. Why doesnt Weisman just go over to the white house in the middle of the night and kick the door in and arrest Trump. Oh, I see. Doesnt work that way when you dont have a case and the defendant has a full team of lawyers.

Also, we know Mueller is busy trying to hastily put together a case against the russian company where the judge has ordered Mueller to be ready for trial. Mueller should have thought of that when he indicted them but thought they would never actually defend themselves. Oops!

Trump is delaying because that is his best legal strategy. I would argue that sitting with Mueller and spilling his guts is the best option but somehow I don’t think that’s where this is going.

Mueller is in the driver’s seat and moving at a pretty speedy pace.

I wouldn’t expect Mueller to pursue any tertiary or unrelated charges like Starr. Most people agree Start overstepped.
 
Back
Top