Gingrich: Send U.S. Marshals to arrest uncooperative judges

[AK Forty Seven]

As previously stated Bushs Presidency was mostly with a Republican House


If Gore had won and had the same Houses Bush did he wouldn't have invaded Iraq and he would not have cut taxs so the debt and deficit would have been much smaller under the democratic Gore then the republican Bush even with the same republican houses

If a republican wins in 2012 they will cut taxes even more and invade and occupy Iran and its Bush all over again

 

[Free Thinker]

Quote from Max E. Pad:

Why dont you complete this chart and show where spending has gone through the first 3 years of Obama?

How long are you planning on hiding the spending increases that have happened under Obama?

republicans are now back in power and they just passed a trillion dollar spending bill. what happened? where are the cuts? its not about reducing the debt with republicans. its who gets the money.

The U.S. House of Representatives has passed a massive $1 trillion dollar spending bill to fund the federal government until next October, averting a partial government shutdown just hours before current funding was set to expire. The U.S. Senate is also expected to pass the spending legislation Saturday, and Senate leaders from both major parties have assured Americans there will be no government shutdown.

 

[Petsamo]

Quote from Free Thinker:
The U.S. House of Representatives has passed a massive $1 trillion dollar spending bill to fund the federal government until next October, averting a partial government shutdown just hours before current funding was set to expire.

Gingrich is not afraid of shutting down the government because he has experience with it in Clinton's presidency.

 

[Max E.]

You dumb fuck that was a spending cut, the bill that they passed would have cut the spending levels from current growth projections, they are throwing out a budget proposal for next year, which is something the democrats havent done for 3 frigging years. I suppose that what they should do is throw out a budget that says they propose zero dollars in spending for next year. Do you even read the articles that you post on here?

All they are doing is slowing down future increases, which is the problem with washington, you never see actual cuts, but at the present time, its far better then anything the dems are offering, which is to just keep spending and spending and spending with no limit, and no slow down in future increases,, the dems just want tax increases so that they can keep the growth going.

You must be screwing with me, surely you cant be this stupid.

Republicans are also big spenders, and they spend just as much as democrats, but this argument on your part is assinine.

Quote from Free Thinker:

republicans are now back in power and they just passed a trillion dollar spending bill. what happened? where are the cuts? its not about reducing the debt with republicans. its who gets the money.

The U.S. House of Representatives has passed a massive $1 trillion dollar spending bill to fund the federal government until next October, averting a partial government shutdown just hours before current funding was set to expire. The U.S. Senate is also expected to pass the spending legislation Saturday, and Senate leaders from both major parties have assured Americans there will be no government shutdown.

 

[jem]

Quote from Max E. Pad:

Leave it up to a hopelessly partisan fool like you to think that democrats are the ones who are curtailing spending. Everyone knows spending originates in congress.

Just for the record, in my opinion Republicans have just as much blame in this mess as democrats do. People like you (rangerover) who actually believe democrats are innocent are completely delusional. Politicians on all sides are spending us into oblivion, but idealogues will delusionally support one side while harping on the other, as the debt just continues to get worse and worse, and rome continues to burn.

response to AK

ibid

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from jem:

response to AK

ibid

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

Republicans had the House most of Bushs Presidency,but most of the debt and deficits are from The Bush tax cuts,Bushs wars,Bushs medicare expansion and Bushs enormous expansion of goverment


So who is to blame ? Should we rename it The Republican House tax cuts,The Republican House's wars,The Republican House's medicare expansion etc

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

As previously stated Bushs Presidency was mostly with a Republican House


If Gore had won and had the same Houses Bush did he wouldn't have invaded Iraq and he would not have cut taxes so the debt and deficit would have been much smaller under the democratic Gore then the republican Bush even with the same republican houses

If a president decides to cut taxes while starting unfunded wars we get huge deficits and debt mostly because of the president,not congress

 

[Free Thinker]

Quote from Max E. Pad:

All they are doing is slowing down future increases, which is the problem with washington, you never see actual cuts, but at the present time, its far better then anything the dems are offering, which is to just keep spending and spending and spending with no limit, and no slow down in future increases,, the dems just want tax increases so that they can keep the growth going.

You must be screwing with me, surely you cant be this stupid.

Republicans are also big spenders, and they spend just as much as democrats, but this argument on your part is assinine.

that the trouble with the republican party they have dumbassed little fox news informed parrots like you as apologists for their failures.

here we are with the congressional tea party republicans at their strongest, whining for a year now about the horrible debt, passing a spending bill about the same size as it has been in the past couple years. if they cant come up with the courage to make cuts in their first spending bill when will they? they even increased military spending. and a fighter program that the military doesnt even want was funded. tell me again about republicans being the party of fiscal restraint. it isnt really about debt reduction with them. its about funding programs they like.

so what do the tea party groups think of the spending restraint the republicans showed?

"Over Friday and Saturday, 61% of House Republicans and 34% of Senate Republicans voted for the omnibus megabus bill. In doing so, not only did they violate their pledge pertaining to bundled (1200-page) bills and the 72-hour layover rule and agree to fund Obamacare, Dodd-Frank, Planned Parenthood, the EPA, the PLO and the UN; they actually agreed to spend almost $9 billion more than last year. Overall, budget authority will be $33 billion higher than the House budget, while appropriations for non-defense spending will be $45 billion more. "

"Throughout the process, GOP leaders and appropriators swore incessantly that the spending measure would not breach the $1.043 trillion cap and would cut $6.7 billion from last year’s budget authority. Well, they have lied."

http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2011/12/17/the-great-spending-betrayal/

"while GOP defense hawks won additional funding to modernize the U.S. nuclear weapons arsenal. The troubled, over-budget, next-generation F-35 fighter plane program would be largely protected."

 

[Max E.]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

The fact of the matter is that there was planned increases in spending this year just like there is every year with the government, why do you think conservatives are so pissed? We never see legitimate cuts from spending levels. What the republicans proposed was a slow down in the increase in spending which is about as far as it goes for cutting spending in washington. The fact of the matter is there are far to many useless tits out there like you who rely on government spending for them to actually cut it flat out.

I:m just as pissed as anyone that there isnt legitimate cuts to spending, and thats The reason the Tea Party is pissed is as well. But the fact of the matter is that the bill they proposed was a reduction in the amount spending was supposed to increase next year, you are just a fundamentalist loser who is incapable of reading and understanding the concept.

The fact is that just like when you were busy accepting the bible word for word, you chose to accept the headline you read off "huffington post" which stated "republicans introduce massive spending bill" and you were caught up in the headline, and to goddamn stupid to figure out that the huffington post was lmisleading you, and playing you for the fool that you are.

It is funny that a guy like you, who said that conservatives are going to throw the country into a depression if they cut spending, is now complaining that conservatives arent actually cutting spending, right after the dems blocked every attempt they have made to freeze or actually cut spending.

Quote from Free Thinker:

that the trouble with the republican party they have dumbassed little fox news informed parrots like you as apologists for their failures.

here we are with the congressional tea party republicans at their strongest, whining for a year now about the horrible debt, passing a spending bill about the same size as it has been in the past couple years. if they cant come up with the courage to make cuts in their first spending bill when will they? they even increased military spending. and a fighter program that the military doesnt even want was funded. tell me again about republicans being the party of fiscal restraint. it isnt really about debt reduction with them. its about funding programs they like.

so what do the tea party groups think of the spending restraint the republicans showed?

"Over Friday and Saturday, 61% of House Republicans and 34% of Senate Republicans voted for the omnibus megabus bill. In doing so, not only did they violate their pledge pertaining to bundled (1200-page) bills and the 72-hour layover rule and agree to fund Obamacare, Dodd-Frank, Planned Parenthood, the EPA, the PLO and the UN; they actually agreed to spend almost $9 billion more than last year. Overall, budget authority will be $33 billion higher than the House budget, while appropriations for non-defense spending will be $45 billion more. "

"Throughout the process, GOP leaders and appropriators swore incessantly that the spending measure would not breach the $1.043 trillion cap and would cut $6.7 billion from last year’s budget authority. Well, they have lied."

http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2011/12/17/the-great-spending-betrayal/

"while GOP defense hawks won additional funding to modernize the U.S. nuclear weapons arsenal. The troubled, over-budget, next-generation F-35 fighter plane program would be largely protected."