getting serious: wealth-lab vs amibroker

Quote from LivermoresGhost:

LOL, you're a very confused boy. Are you sure you're not a systematic trader who believes in a discretionary approach?
More...

LOL..You had me thinking for a second,but there is no doubt,i am a discretionary trader who likes a systematic approack..Ask me again tomorrow,and maybe ill flip:)
 
Quote from psytrade:

I agree with the previous poster. Same experience with Amibroker. I use it extensibely, and I found a programmer to help me out with workarounds for a very reasonable fee when I can't do it myself. ( Files, advanced backtesting, scaling, etc) Most of the complex stuff actually gives no edge to me anyways... so you can do 99% of what you want without help.
More...


I share the same experience....Ami can be a very simple charting tool with easy backtesting,optimisation amd money management..

If you feel like raisng the bar and tackling complex tasks,you better prepare yourself for a severly steep learning curve...

Psytrade is 100% correct...If you are not a programmer,and dont want to make acareer of becoming one,get one of the non Ami programmers to write up code for a modest fee.Unless you enjoy pain:D
 
Yes, the performances that he said is only the speed of running the back-testing of some simple trading system, and that system does not have the position sizing and portfolio management.
TradeStation is more robust than WLD and AB. It's direct-access feature has more order types and their combination. But the portfolio management should use the add-on of RINA.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top