Getting down and dirty is where the rubber meets the road ...

Quote from ehorn:

I would see it as 2B (\) in the nesting of fractals. HTH

attachment.php
More...

thanks for dealing with the order of events.

Please use this to get the carry over ready for Tuesday, a full day..
 
Quote from jack hershey:

we took profits at the top of bar 8, bookmarked it and we are reversed short.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Jack

I have three questions with respect to bar 8---

1. What signal did you get from the market to take profit at the top of bar 8?

2. Is bar 8 considered a VE of two bar trend?

3. Did the assumed VE on bar 8 lead you to reverse short? Or, any other reasons?

TIA
More...
 

Attachments

Quote from NYCMB:

Quote from jack hershey:

we took profits at the top of bar 8, bookmarked it and we are reversed short.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Jack

I have three questions with respect to bar 8---

1. What signal did you get from the market to take profit at the top of bar 8?

2. Is bar 8 considered a VE of two bar trend?

3. Did the assumed VE on bar 8 lead you to reverse short? Or, any other reasons?

TIA
More...
8 is ftt of 6,7. Reverse short & bookmark new pt 1.
More...
 
Quote from jack hershey:



Its like solving the oil spill and making money doing it with just a few days work applied to commonly available materials sitting in warehouses surrounding the Dome in New Orleans. Bolts of either kevlar or reinforced rubber could be epoxied together to make a ring (1,000 feet across) of material that could be pleated temporarily and then folded into a pile and put on a trck/barge and lowered to the bottom in 1,000 foot tubes (splice 6 of them in series) and capture ALL the oil spilled. Pumps on barges could suck the surface at 60,000 barrels a day and put it is boats that could take the oil to nearby refineries. Checks would pay for the oil. when the pressure at the well head finally lessen to the technological level for capping it and handling the volume, then the weel goes into a routine status and BP is dissolved and never allowed to work in the industry again.
More...

With all due respect, I don't think this would work. First of all, there are strong currents down there. I dit quite a bit of scuba diving, sometimes you go 100 feet down and it is a fast moving river down there. Try 5000 feet. Your fabric tube would have to be weighted at the bottom and stretched up... how are you going to do that? Basically, you would create not a stable tube but a flat sail, 7850000 sft big (500 foot radius times 2 times Pi times 5000 feet height, divided into 2)... can you imagine the drag currents would create on that area? You fly a glider, you should know....would be impossible to keep this open inside to work as a funnel IMO.

Anyways, this has nothing to do with trading :-)
 
Quote from Vienna:

With all due respect, I don't think this would work. First of all, there are strong currents down there. I dit quite a bit of scuba diving, sometimes you go 100 feet down and it is a fast moving river down there. Try 5000 feet. Your fabric tube would have to be weighted at the bottom and stretched up... how are you going to do that? Basically, you would create not a stable tube but a flat sail, 7850000 sft big (500 foot radius times 2 times Pi times 5000 feet height, divided into 2)... can you imagine the drag currents would create on that area? You fly a glider, you should know....would be impossible to keep this open inside to work as a funnel IMO.

Anyways, this has nothing to do with trading :-)
More...

Thanks for your commments.

Weighting the bottom of the tube from the onset is a natural. And doing it with a cool structural system that handles a lot of factors would be included. A system of vertical strong connections to the weighting would go far.

Drag on a cylinder that is under pressure rends to create two not one partial vacuums opposite one another. (this is how you creatd the flat surface, perhaps. BUT we always have expanding gasses and all the prssure the oil is introducing. this is kept track of so that when the overall wellhead pressure drops to the contemporary technology levels, then the well head is capped.

Think of guy wires on a tall antenna as well. Oftem all the radial guys have the same remote lower end point. Vuring each segment of the tube is bolted on with liners on both sides, guys would also be attached.

The flat sail possibility is negated in several ways. return to the basic problem of the spill: PRESSURE. tHE GASES CONTINUALLY EXPAND AND FINALLY ARE CAPTURED AND LIQUIFIED INTO LNG BY PUTTING A MEMBRANE OVER THE LIFEPRESERVER. People inside the membrane are in small floating uinits which keep the pump inlets organized to get rid of serwater mixing with the oil, tyey wear space suits during rhier shifts.

As much as I would like t, making the cylinder into a "spinner" by dealing with the bottom and top, I thought I would pass on this energy generator initially. Dropping outer cylinders around the original could be done to focus on currents and counter currents and extract energy.

It would also be possible to use under water craft to hook onto guys to counter currents. Or just install fins to handle forces the currents create.

A 5:1 ratio, structurally, is not a tough structure to handle.

Cheap solutions go quite a ways if people who are in control of the problem solving are allowed to get the job done.
 
Hi Jack.

Below I attach an unresolved puzzle that you gave to me at the beginning of this year.
____________________________________________________
Want to see something?

sym>>> FTP>>>>XB.

sym>> FTP>>>hitch>>>>ST R.

sym>>>FTP>>>>>hitch>>>ST R>>>>>OB B.

Lets add some strings of bars with semi colons:

sym>>> FTP>>>>XB; sym>>> FTP>>>XB; FTP>>>XB; XB: XB; FTP.

sym>> FTP>>>hitch>>>>ST R; FBP>>XR; XR.

sym>>>FTP>>>>>hitch>>>ST R>>>>>OB B; FTP>>>XB.

It must be gibberish cause I wrote it.

What would it be like if all conventional formations were written in terms of Boolean vectors? I know, easy to program as inductive back testing.....LOL....
__________________________________________________

Could you please give another more explicit stroke on how to use the logging of forming-bar's mutation cases to do intrabar MADA sweep? What is the purpose to compare a forming bar to prior closed bar?

I also attach your log here that you may need to use to elaborate.

attachment.php


Thank you for the help.
 

Attachments

I guess ... :)
One simple way is to log within the five minute ES bars. I log within the 2 minute bars of YM, concurrently. I log 10 other things too. My mind has this finite set's combinations placed in an order like the scale in music.

Six of the 9 cases deal with equal or decreasing volatility; all are 100% overlap. The other three are where money is made: OB, XB or XR and ST R or ST B. In these three, overlap can be put into five classes, each having their own portent. ...

Who reading this is going to examine the nine cases. Who is going to review the six that don't and the three that do (have 100% overlap). ALL OCD's here in ET are going to.

What will happen to the OP's mind if he regards the cases and the extent of the overlap; he will have a beginning of a new first recourse begin to happen. What if he "SEES" that the other three TELL him which side of the market is the right side? Then he can override his current emotional failure.

Look at edge selection and trading. This inductive process is probaility based instead of go/nogo based. What is the forte of chopsing go/ no go? It is in chosing a measure that is NOT a value but is a vector instead.

To use volatility and overlap it must be done in a vector (comparitive) context.
More...
Quote from SK0:

Hi Jack.

Below I attach an unresolved puzzle that you gave to me at the beginning of this year.
____________________________________________________
Want to see something?

sym>>> FTP>>>>XB. LONG

sym>> FTP>>>hitch>>>>ST R. SHORT

sym>>>FTP>>>>>hitch>>>ST R>>>>>OB B. LONG

Lets add some strings of bars with semi colons:

sym>>> FTP>>>>XB; sym>>> FTP>>>XB; FTP>>>XB; XB: XB; FTP. LONG

sym>> FTP>>>hitch>>>>ST R; FBP>>XR; XR. SHORT

sym>>>FTP>>>>>hitch>>>ST R>>>>>OB B; FTP>>>XB. LONG

It must be gibberish cause I wrote it.

What would it be like if all conventional formations were written in terms of Boolean vectors? I know, easy to program as inductive back testing.....LOL....
__________________________________________________

Could you please give another more explicit stroke on how to use the logging of forming-bar's mutation cases to do intrabar MADA sweep? What is the purpose to compare a forming bar to prior closed bar?

I also attach your log here that you may need to use to elaborate.

attachment.php


Thank you for the help.
More...
 

Attachments

You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top