Okay. So far we have covered one level of parallelogram. It was the bar to bar smallest ES observable level of parallelogram.
On the YM 2 minute, usually you see one faster fractal opbservable paralleogerm which is annotated and which helps you deal with any bar to bar Q's on the ES from a learning and MADA point of view.
Each completed ftt to ftt on the level discussed is a point to point movement on the next slower fractal.
For reference on DKM 110 1 FT 1, which has bars numbered, this would have been bars 30 , 31 and 32 to complete an ftt to ftt on the move from poijnt 1 to point 2 on the TF. Bars 33 through 36 inclusive was the move from point 2 to point 3 on the TF. And bars 36 and 37 was the move from point 3 to the FTT.
The first move of the long TF was bars 37, 38 and 39 to begin with and then a series of events ended the long TF and reverted the bars from the initial FTT on bar 37 to obtain a new final FTT of the TF short.
This brings us to a comment on what separates the work of building bar to bar trends from ftt to ftt from slower level FTT to FTT pattern building. It is the limits of the parallelogram that is being applied.
To begin learning it was necessary to have a parallelogram outside of these limits, i. e., a sloping trendline parallelogram.
To ease into beginning under other situations is a brief set of tasks. Just get to the point of having two bars. Now, all that is excluded are OB's and laterals.
By regarding an OB as a bar with two points upon it, generally, you see that it will be fitting into two ftt to ftt observable trends. The lateral becomes a more than two bar case and is trated as a single bar on the ftt to ftt level. Use the zonings appropriately.
To turn this post into long term memory ordinarily takes a long set of Q's and A's because these individual pieces are usually just read and not exposed to critical thinking. Critical thinking begions the process of creating the mental resourse in long term memory.
How does a person's background play out in this process? All fifferently trained people do it in different ways. an English major would delight in considering syntax and the structure of complete thoughts called sentences.
A geologist would turn to crystals and their structures and replications.
An organic chemist would turn to how carbon works with other elements and complexes.
Musicians, artists and everyone else's profession, occupation or hobbies show how all bodies of knowledge and associated skills are acquired and become long term memory as a resourse. the mamory collection is referred to as a differentiated body or collection and that shows how the brain organized it as part of its operating procedure in human beings.
A lot of things people do well is the result of practice. I call doing practice, work. Without work the mind does not acquire according to its operating needs.
I think we can have breakthroughs in all the issues here in this thread. By going thropugh all the levels of acquisition to the expert level, we can do a sort of check off and pin point what is missing in the differentiation of various participants. Perhaps, people can use this as they passforward to others. Passing forward is the most common "check off procedure for the passer. He gets to know quite well just what it is he has to review and bring up to snuff to help others.
What does skipping steps in doing the work represent? It is just the creation of voids here and thee in the growing differentiation?
Ordinarily, a person can take one of the video recorded whole days (YM, ES, etc) and go through it in 40 minutes to do the trades of the day. This is just a statement of the mind's real time capability compared to the passage of real time in a market over a 6 and 1/2 hour RTH period.