Quote from dkm:
I am assuming that there is a âconventionâ that must be applied in order to connect a series of bars in accordance with the 10 cases and thereby create FFâs, TFâs and SFâs.
My statement is to use parallelograms to create the P, V pattern which is called B2B 2R 2B or R2R 2B 2R. B and R are colors which are named for direction which is called a vector. Occassionally the 10 cases enter the picture for deciding issues with respect to "adjacent bars", which are a concern of the HS and its PM.
In the above paragraph, please find two rules:
1. Use parallelograms.
2. There is one pattern, use it.
It is apparent, due to the number of errors and inventions on my chart clip that I am not adopting the required convention, even at the most basic level of FF.
You are correct about what you are not doing. Here. we are shifting to what to do. Lierally, and with respect to neuroplasticity, we will build a new resourse for you to use to make parallelograms and to use the pattern. your corrent resourse will remain but it will no longer be your first recourse. By putting what we build infront of what you now have, the new replaces the old.
If it is possible to describe the convention as a simple ruleset then perhaps it would be best to dispense with my poorly annotated chart and describe the convention, case by case.
Yes.
A clean chart for everyone's reference is always a good resourse.
The convention is your term and I will use it. The convention is to build parallelograms fractal by fractal. The rule is to begin with the fastest observable fractal on the insturment traded and annotate thoroughly the pattern on each fractal. Line wieght and colors B and R are used. Some platforms do not allow this.so substitutes are made. In the years ahead, plaforms will have better utility.
ID the points and the FTT's on each fractal to show the parallelogram structure.
The platform chosen can automatically show you the cases in yellow boxes and the lateral can be shown as a blue box since it is often alonger formation.
Volume PACE is shown as a 1600 bar record updated bar by bar. Deciles provide the basis for the six PACES: E, H, M, L DU, and VDU. extremes ae single deciles and non extremes are pairs of deciles. This automatic annotation is for reference and for using in the construction of all distributions of anything in PEP and its applications.
There is NO case by case thing done as part of any part of MADA. What is done is to deal with three types of developments of the parallelograms deployed.
I call these three things: VE's on the LTL (acceleration); expansion (faster observable movements all within parallelograms); and Fanning (adjustments to the RTL's to accomodate borderline activity on the RTL). Logic requires that the three possible cases be handled on equal footing to be sure that the parallelograms are CONSISTENTLY PROCESSED. In this thread I have typed the words for the rules for each of these items. you will find them in your compilation in the three ring binders for the four parts of the infromation classification being used. Gradually, I will make clear by drilling down into the details of each and every trading application on each level of expertese. 2^5 is a way of looking at five levels of refinement to get to having certainty for about anything in PEP and its applications. If I have to, will spell out how critical thinking works to that level of iterative refinement.[/color
If we had a concise and clear description of when and how to connect which ends of each pair of bars, including when to fan and when to accelerate the rtl, I suspect that we would make significantly faster progress.
We do NOT connect which ends of EACH pair of bars; instead, we build parallelograms fractal by fractal and the fractals are interrelated completely and thoroughly by the pattern which emerged from the critical thinking process of devloping the paradigm. Paradigm theory and logic theory are the source of the pattern and why it is the only and unique pattern that exists in markets. The pattern came into being because trends overlap. trends begin their overlap at the point of failure and end their overlap at the point of indepedence and closure of the prior non stationary window of the prior parallelogram's existance.
I am most grateful for your patience and perseverance.
