Getting down and dirty is where the rubber meets the road ...
- Thread starter charts
- Start date
On bar 35 the SF LTL drawn in is broken as a VE; then the LTL of the TF3 is broken as a VE. And the ltl of the FF3 is missing and not annotated.
Here are the lines slicing bar 35
Here are the lines slicing bar 35
Quote from jack hershey:
On bar 35 the SF LTL drawn in is broken as a VE; then the LTL of the TF3 is broken as a VE. And the ltl of the FF3 is missing and not annotated.
Here are the lines slicing bar 35
We stay in the zone for 8 more bars AND only then does the M1 and M2 begin.
In terms of learning it is a good idea to have the "zones" in place to be able to have an awareness of this information. Our rules for anotating give us the wisdom and our minds CAN summon this once it is in place for our O1, O2 and O3 to use.
For trading the TF, we are in the groove and long and looking for the FTT reversal signal. It comes on the ftt of M2 as is stated as part of our inference which is located in the differentiation of our minds (all long term memory information). This awareness of how trading works allows us to IMMEDIATELY know that we know the M@ ftt is where the FTT of the TF resides. This information in long term memory gets there by drills.
Drill.
1. Annotate the zone which is between two lines: the old LTL and the new LTL.
2. do acceleration when a ve or VE occurs on a ltl of a parallelogram. Do not switch fractals to do acceleration. reach back to parallelogram qualitified poionts and get the RTL slopped more extremely as much as possible.
as we follow the M1 and M2, we get to shove the Blue SF rtl up into where the misplaced TF 3 rtl is and we shove the TF3 up so the M1 ftt is new point 3.
I didn't move those lines so you can see how not doing acceleration delays the trader's ability to make money by using the MADA and its swift and decisive processes.
here is the picture and the FTT of the TF3 and the SF long are on the IBGS bar. @ the time of the GS, the trader goes short to begin the overlap of the TF's (old TF3 and new TF1)
I think everyone can see that the "zone' labelled ftt, where it is knwn that an M1 and M@ are coming, is going to also have a bookmark wipeout within the fractal (TF) wherby the FF does not complete a three move series of events.
As you see I really have to do a lot of work on just the first illustration of four to make the p[oint that ftt's and FTT's need to be done correctly using the compilatiion in the three ring binder under the four parts. there is some work involved in learning and there is the awarenss aspect of trading to make money.
I don't care about the criticisms of my lack of ability to communicate; that as you will see is just monkey brain talk form people who brains are controlled by "monkey talk". If they were in charge of their minds, they would be aware and compassionate and wise. Look briefly at TZ's blah blah blah response to the pattern and my 17 calls one day in advance.
Here I am explaining how to get through a day by learning and trading in an earnest and aware manner. I am putting in the "fix" for each and every deviation by a trader when he is using something other than what is called for.
I didn't move those lines so you can see how not doing acceleration delays the trader's ability to make money by using the MADA and its swift and decisive processes.
here is the picture and the FTT of the TF3 and the SF long are on the IBGS bar. @ the time of the GS, the trader goes short to begin the overlap of the TF's (old TF3 and new TF1)
I think everyone can see that the "zone' labelled ftt, where it is knwn that an M1 and M@ are coming, is going to also have a bookmark wipeout within the fractal (TF) wherby the FF does not complete a three move series of events.
As you see I really have to do a lot of work on just the first illustration of four to make the p[oint that ftt's and FTT's need to be done correctly using the compilatiion in the three ring binder under the four parts. there is some work involved in learning and there is the awarenss aspect of trading to make money.
I don't care about the criticisms of my lack of ability to communicate; that as you will see is just monkey brain talk form people who brains are controlled by "monkey talk". If they were in charge of their minds, they would be aware and compassionate and wise. Look briefly at TZ's blah blah blah response to the pattern and my 17 calls one day in advance.
Here I am explaining how to get through a day by learning and trading in an earnest and aware manner. I am putting in the "fix" for each and every deviation by a trader when he is using something other than what is called for.
Bar 53 is an OB. OB's are considered cases and their unique and interesting characterisitic is that they represent two points in the language of the patternon a bar to bar fractal.
There is a drill where you do 1600 bars and use a few steps. As I remember they are steps 6 through 9 and there you create a 3D excel "map" of the occurance of OB's over a sample for an instrument.
Ob's never escape annotating. If they do something is amise and the mind is not firing on all O's.
If you ever read beat the dealer and you dropped in in Vegas mentally equipped. You wind up counting how man dealer changes pit bosses affect per hour. OB's are face cards in 5's theory; they change the game because of how the deck is used.
OB's are two points on the FF. When you see one, the house is screwed for that deal.
Looky at Lo of MIT. He creates 77 bars and has 17 OB's in the sequence. What are we saying here on that page of a NSF supported research operation. What we are saying is get the cricket out to change the dealer of bars. Give him a mop so he can clean bar floors in Vegas. Call NSF and tell them his random bar generator has a monkey brain and it is broken. He put his monkey brain to work on a noise eliminator and they found the O1, O2 and O3 signal babies in the bathwater.
drill.
1. If there is an OB, it has two points and you incorprate each in your annotation.
2. Check your 3d chart and see what volume PACE is represented for those 1600 bars you checked out.
There is a drill where you do 1600 bars and use a few steps. As I remember they are steps 6 through 9 and there you create a 3D excel "map" of the occurance of OB's over a sample for an instrument.
Ob's never escape annotating. If they do something is amise and the mind is not firing on all O's.
If you ever read beat the dealer and you dropped in in Vegas mentally equipped. You wind up counting how man dealer changes pit bosses affect per hour. OB's are face cards in 5's theory; they change the game because of how the deck is used.
OB's are two points on the FF. When you see one, the house is screwed for that deal.
Looky at Lo of MIT. He creates 77 bars and has 17 OB's in the sequence. What are we saying here on that page of a NSF supported research operation. What we are saying is get the cricket out to change the dealer of bars. Give him a mop so he can clean bar floors in Vegas. Call NSF and tell them his random bar generator has a monkey brain and it is broken. He put his monkey brain to work on a noise eliminator and they found the O1, O2 and O3 signal babies in the bathwater.
drill.
1. If there is an OB, it has two points and you incorprate each in your annotation.
2. Check your 3d chart and see what volume PACE is represented for those 1600 bars you checked out.
Thanks again Jack, great review of price -volume.