Getting down and dirty is where the rubber meets the road ...
- Thread starter charts
- Start date
This is the degapped chart with only the fast fractal carryover.
This is all we have to begin to get into the three fractal nested ball park.
All of this follows from rules of M of MADA.
Trading is done with MADA where four sets of routine type rules yield the trader's decisiona and behavioral actions to make money all in a condext of dectutive critical thinking.
Induction is a no no and it is done as part of CW and its OODA betting routine.
Note well that perception is what is used in Analysis and it comes from the sum of sensing in M of MADA plus the inference of the mind's long term memory.
SCT is learned by buildinbg the inference of the mind so that what is sensed is properly matched with the mind's inference.
Organized inference is called differentiation.
In the global cultures of today the great resourse of how the mind works is NOT used to learn or to solve problems. That is just the way it is.
If you look at the videos and transcripts of my lectures in the Psych Dept @ Mich, you get to see this applied to a theory of learning over 30 and nearly 40 years ago.
Parallelograms are used in PEP and its apps BECAUSE, by deduction this is THE bunary vector container dictated by the HS and like kind PM's of PEP. Trends FAIL and that is where the parallelogram OVERLAP begins for the successive trend.
AFTER the point of trend failure, the non stationary window focusses on the SUCCESS of the movements in the NEW trend. IF and WHEN this effort fails BY NOT COMPLETING THE NESTED FRACTALS, THEN to old trend is renewed to GET TO IT NEW POINT OF FAILURE.
All the above is called "reasoning" and "reasoning" is done in the context of known scientific theories and practices.
Gambling and betting is done under other auspices and it is still the CONVETION OF THE FINANCIAL INDUSTRY. They choose to gamble and they chose many many "bandaids to minimize the aspects of gambling.
PEP and it apps is a paradigm shift away from gambling. There is no way inventiions and experiments that are inductively based can be melded into PEP and its applications. Please refrain.
This is all we have to begin to get into the three fractal nested ball park.
All of this follows from rules of M of MADA.
Trading is done with MADA where four sets of routine type rules yield the trader's decisiona and behavioral actions to make money all in a condext of dectutive critical thinking.
Induction is a no no and it is done as part of CW and its OODA betting routine.
Note well that perception is what is used in Analysis and it comes from the sum of sensing in M of MADA plus the inference of the mind's long term memory.
SCT is learned by buildinbg the inference of the mind so that what is sensed is properly matched with the mind's inference.
Organized inference is called differentiation.
In the global cultures of today the great resourse of how the mind works is NOT used to learn or to solve problems. That is just the way it is.
If you look at the videos and transcripts of my lectures in the Psych Dept @ Mich, you get to see this applied to a theory of learning over 30 and nearly 40 years ago.
Parallelograms are used in PEP and its apps BECAUSE, by deduction this is THE bunary vector container dictated by the HS and like kind PM's of PEP. Trends FAIL and that is where the parallelogram OVERLAP begins for the successive trend.
AFTER the point of trend failure, the non stationary window focusses on the SUCCESS of the movements in the NEW trend. IF and WHEN this effort fails BY NOT COMPLETING THE NESTED FRACTALS, THEN to old trend is renewed to GET TO IT NEW POINT OF FAILURE.
All the above is called "reasoning" and "reasoning" is done in the context of known scientific theories and practices.
Gambling and betting is done under other auspices and it is still the CONVETION OF THE FINANCIAL INDUSTRY. They choose to gamble and they chose many many "bandaids to minimize the aspects of gambling.
PEP and it apps is a paradigm shift away from gambling. There is no way inventiions and experiments that are inductively based can be melded into PEP and its applications. Please refrain.
Quote from jack hershey:
Here we look at the first four bars of the day.
What we have to work with is one level of annotation and we use that to "build" the nested fractals where it is done in only one way using cases and parallelograms in the context of deductive reasoning.
As a trader who can be an example here in this repair work, I can say that I always have a complete A of analysis going on. What this means is that I have a specific element of the fintie set of elements of the analysis finite set.
In the present I have this by using MADA cycles within the progress of the market as the forming of bars goess along.
Itis called unconscious competence. You have that when you drive a car. We can debate suconciouness and unconsciousness later while at the next global meeting while socializing.
We do MADA consciously and it leads us to felings of support, comfort and confidence. These come from below our neck level. we are unconscious of the welling up of "knowing that we know as in a matter of purposeful thinking in a critical way.
When we have doine what is needed to "know that we know", thn we are a closure of a routine and in coherent balance.
As the mind is being build, it keeps asking for more buikding material. This is an assembly process and it is NOT a debate process of weeding or separating the grain from the chaff.
By looking at what we have to work with, we begin to construct the nested fractals.
So far we have three ftt's on the same levle so we draw green book marks to assess their compilation capability in terms of making a new slower fractal.
the short and long do not make a short trading fractal since the long ends too high. We throw the short aside and consider the next two (long and short. We see that the short ftt is above the first ftt, so a trading fractal is possible.
When the pink RTL is runn ftt to ftt, there is a geomtric interference and so se fan to have a geometric solution.
As a trader we could just be trading ftt to ftt and getting the job done. As we past the last ftt we went long.
The forming bar finally finishes as it went through a bunch of mutations. There were MADA laps or cycles as well and a lot of logging.
We can reverse on the post stitch BLK >>>OP top because we are doing a ve and we will or will not be in the "zone" after that.
If zone, then M1 ftt is next trade, If not zone then we are r2r in a fast Fractal. after ftt on beginning of upcoming bar.
Now we have advanced to a TWO fractal level of building. we have fast fractals and trading fractals
So far we have three ftt's on the same levle so we draw green book marks to assess their compilation capability in terms of making a new slower fractal.
the short and long do not make a short trading fractal since the long ends too high. We throw the short aside and consider the next two (long and short. We see that the short ftt is above the first ftt, so a trading fractal is possible.
When the pink RTL is runn ftt to ftt, there is a geomtric interference and so se fan to have a geometric solution.
As a trader we could just be trading ftt to ftt and getting the job done. As we past the last ftt we went long.
The forming bar finally finishes as it went through a bunch of mutations. There were MADA laps or cycles as well and a lot of logging.
We can reverse on the post stitch BLK >>>OP top because we are doing a ve and we will or will not be in the "zone" after that.
If zone, then M1 ftt is next trade, If not zone then we are r2r in a fast Fractal. after ftt on beginning of upcoming bar.
Now we have advanced to a TWO fractal level of building. we have fast fractals and trading fractals
Here is the additional progress we have made so far.
As we pull out of the long trading fractal after the VE and the subsequent FTT, we are on a fast fractal short and it accelerates.
For me I take my marching orders on the advance of the market and CONCLUDE that even without a carry over short trading set of RTL and LTL's, I am breaching the old trading fractal FTT and have a NEW FTT on the end of this fast fractal move,
This gives us TWO fractals for rolling out the day, We want to get to THREE by the end of the day if possible. BY 11:30 you have enough FTT's to give you pt 1 pt 2 and pt 3 of the slow fractal. Put it in and get to carryover with three nested fractals running to debrief and get ready for the next day.
As we pull out of the long trading fractal after the VE and the subsequent FTT, we are on a fast fractal short and it accelerates.
For me I take my marching orders on the advance of the market and CONCLUDE that even without a carry over short trading set of RTL and LTL's, I am breaching the old trading fractal FTT and have a NEW FTT on the end of this fast fractal move,
This gives us TWO fractals for rolling out the day, We want to get to THREE by the end of the day if possible. BY 11:30 you have enough FTT's to give you pt 1 pt 2 and pt 3 of the slow fractal. Put it in and get to carryover with three nested fractals running to debrief and get ready for the next day.