Quote from jack hershey:
Probably we should post a progress report each week. this can be done publically by the learner. At this point the pm list provided to me is very very impressive.
Quote from jack hershey:
I assume you are referring to the debriefing and not the logging.
to debrief, you note the three nested fractal's order of events. Use a fourth column to list the bars where change occurs through out the RTH's. It can be most of a portrait page.
At the bottom, for each day you can put in the carryover information in a form similar to the textual example I gave. as part of the day's work you put this on top of the reverse chron 3 ring binder you keep. A two inch binder will suffice for three or four weeks. You can label the cover of the bindr according to the weeks of the year. Mt day's work includes 10 to 12 pages of logs, two protrait prints of the day's paned glued together and folded (11 by 17 inches), and the trades printed in reverse chron as landscapes (my trades are partial fills on two levels), and the debriefing pages ( the sheet I have mentioned and there is a daily email that varies form 1 to 4 pages).
The log is 12columns wide as a landscape and margins are used for the leading indicator that is of note. Per bar each of the mutations of the forming bar is noted and in the context of the nested fractls. Some days of the week this is an attachment to the email. The two sheets of the PV panes are always part of the email as is the debriefing which contains the carryover. thus everyone is on the same page. Others originate the distribution of the PVT info. 30 minute tiles for each annotated stock are used.
The recipients are on skype and cell phones according to their mutual agreements.
my general impression of the way the public operates is that it is fairly casual. I hear of people making a point or two per day on the ES and doing some percentage a year position trading stocks by some approach. the big money record is boradly known. Here in tucson and around the globe, we do trading in another realm of performance.
It is possible to compare. I like the Greensoon and Steenbarger modus as a comparison. greenspoon gets therapy form Steenbarger and he trades 400 contracts 60 times a day and makes an average of less than a tick on 24,000 daily actions (about 10K). his capital is as expected.
Quote from SK0:
Jack, kindly refer to the bold, red-color sentences in above post shown on page 10. It is about using PRV.
You have mentioned them, similarly, numerous times in the past. I guess I know what you mean to compare PRV to prior completed volume bar, ie the 12 seconds stuff etc. But comparing the closing gap of PRV to forming volume bar, surges and stalls, price bar mutation... I am largely clueless for a long time. Where is the connection? When is the critical time to pay attention on PRV? Should we merely need to know increasing/decreasing, or pace level, or peak/trough in volume, and how?
Also, does PRV link to price bar volatility and overlap with prior price bar vs pace look-up table which you covered in another post? Do we have to memorize the volatility values and overlap ratio for each pace level? What if the volatility of a bar and overlap with prior bar turn out falling outside the heavily populated gaussian zones in the look-up table? Apparently, knowing higher pace leads to higher bar volatility and lower bar overlap is not sufficient.
I know I am asking lousy questions. But I have to ask now, somehow, before you run too far ahead.
So far, the content in this thread has been extremely helpful. Thank you very much.
Quote from SK0:
Jack, kindly refer to the bold, red-color sentences in above post shown on page 10. It is about using PRV.
You have mentioned them, similarly, numerous times in the past. I guess I know what you mean to compare PRV to prior completed volume bar, ie the 12 seconds stuff etc. But comparing the closing gap of PRV to forming volume bar, surges and stalls, price bar mutation... I am largely clueless for a long time. Where is the connection?
In the log, the connection is made with the four rightmost columns. The case columns are the vernier for these columns.
PRV defines which of the HS hypotheses are at play: H1 or H2. Most rows of the log give an H1 or H2 context which is very pertinent. The HS is trend oriented and PEP is trend following in the market sense and NOT in the Covel "Trend Following" written collection of gleening interviews sense.
this allows a person to build a context upon the moves within the patterns of the three fracatals.
This gives the "know that you know context"
your subsequent questions fleash this out. what all the questions represent is the mind asking for more long term memory elements to "fill in " some spaces in between what is already built. This series is called "putting the pieces together" once the drills do actually do this are being done.
Before in this thread those drills were introduced. They get to be done as a consequence of doing the M of MADA on the 10 days prior to the Present. This occurred early in the thread as a prep effort to get to know the k200 and undrstand the medium and long trem context.
When is the critical time to pay attention on PRV?
as you fill in the volume colume on the log each lap of MADA. MADA is a routine that formalizes trading to make money. It is done over and over and has an interesting feature. It eliminates the freak out trading that is a consequence of continued concentration on the market. not having a routine is where the 10,000 hours myth originated. OODA also lacks this feature of MADA. The four steps end with an action that is the consequence of a deductive conclusion. MADA is a series of one to one finite set element matchings that are invariant. the consequence in reasoning and logic terms is called "closure". After closure is reached, then a person is free to repeat the routine.
As you tell us you do not use the routine as a habit but instead you look for significant things to help you get the job done. I am suggesting a simpler alternative that keep you in the better place for extracting segments of profits. that is doing a routine which include volume just before you note the order of events unfolding on three nested fractals.
My viewpoint can become rather persuasive to some people. The featureof closure is what makes trading like driving a car. It is the mechanism that most leads to coherence on the EMwave pc meter.closure is like the end of the recitation of a mantra cycle. It affords you a rock solid moment from which you embark to take another MADA llap. the mind is a terrific thing and making use of it is a terrific experience which I encourage.
Should we merely need to know increasing/decreasing, or pace level, or peak/trough in volume?
we track the process of movement by these variables you mention. Our measure is a binary vector that gives certainty. Dominant and non dominant comes from volume and it is associated with the price moves in the order of events of the nested fractals where the pattern onfolds. As you see all the time the moves in various fractals are in a context that is relatively based and not absolutely based. Look at the peaks and troughs of three concurrent fractals. They are nested within one another and they are relative within each fractal.
Awakening to these things is a process where the consciousness comes from an unconsciousness. Once you discover what nesting means, you get to follow the dominant and nondominant moves of each fractal and see how relativiety works.
As the years pass I keepencouraging people to do routines and get way from the "concentration (freakout)" you see all over ET in many many threads. Examine PA trading in its many forms. It lacks a routine because donimance and non dominance cannot be ascertained. Many people use three price charts of different durations as a substitute for using volume to determine sentiment and dominance More often than not they are bushwacked as they concentrate and not sense what the market is doing. The other word or phrase is called discipline and following the trading betting plan. there is no way to build inference or differentiation in a betting and concentrating OODA methodology. It is by definition incoherent and much much research have verified this emotioal trait that is persistent. (fear anxiety and anger.) there are many client patient examples where the treatment regimes are made public.
Most all of market movement is counterintuitive. The triad nature of trends the patternn) is counterintuitive to an up/down orientation. the majority do not control markets; the minority does. Here we are finding all of this out.
and how?
The MADA routine is how. the log shows row by row the order of ecents. you foolw othe relative patterns on the three fractals. As you will now begin to see there are peaks and sub peaks and each applied to a differnt pattern on different fractals. the same is true for troughs. Troughs occur at high altitude for some troughs. Other lowest trough continue to be lower as the PACE lessens. In the pm the troughs may be higher and higher as PACE quickens. All of this is putting the pieces together.
At some point you will become familiar with IBGS's. Interbar means within a five minute bar, the YM often reveals this for ES trading. Peaks and troughs are rounded as in Gaussian functions. Shifting from one Gaussian to another also occurs.
Also, does PRV link to price bar volatility and overlap with prior price bar vs pace look-up table which you covered in another post?
Yes, this is wheresomeof the relativity comes from the other source is PACE change. Here we are focussing closely on filling in gaps in your differentiation. your mind is simply asking for addition peices of inference to stick in between what you know, Most of this happens while you sleep and consequently you have aha's and sometimes AHA's or a religious experience.
why don't some people have these happening frequently and in great degree? They have nothing in their minds to create what you are creating. In ET this has been described with a lot of vocabulary words by people who recognize their dillema or dillemas. getting to a dilema is the process of going out on a limg and expecting the lind to function as a trunk of a learning tree. you see other branche and on way to get to them since you cannot erase a trip from A to B in the mind.
Do we have to memorize the volatility values and overlap ratio for each pace level?
No certainly not. Think of it as where you live. you can look at the mountains in any direction and figure out where you are. By having done the 3D drill to create the Excel you see the nature of the peaks and troughs and you recognize the way the ridge of means noves on the 3 de charts. An ATS uses this to "differentiate" signals so that only the proper set is in used for a given making money strategy. The shells of the ATS are how one is enabled to move to optimum of effectiveness and efficiency. This is definitely not done with a stat approach because, in the end just "mud" is created as shown by the CW performance of the industry.
What if the volatility of a bar and overlap with prior bar turn out falling outside the heavily populated gaussian zones in the look-up table?
this is a quick recognization of "News". This happened to me on 9/11 using the Chicago based data. I literally shouted to Liz to turn on the TV. For SCT traders, taking the ride is what is at hand. One FEB a while back at the end of the month there was an 89 point ride over a few hours.
One of the presenters from Barron's shows a slide of a stock; it clearly shows an impeding piece of News. the slide is Enron before the News broke. He joked with my reponse to the slide before he showed the next slide. Enron was leaving its populated zone.
Apparently, knowing higher pace leads to higher bar volatility and lower bar overlap is not sufficient.
you are correct. Knowledge is not the goal. skills come from perception instead. Having all the facts is knowledge. arranging knowldege into a differentiated continuum is the goal.
What this accomplishment does is make available the inference needed as you do sensing of the market. Concentratin does give this for OODA traders. They sit and watch price go through the bets they have on as explained in this thread by an OODA type BS'er.
The bridge is doing drills in a context that is known. It is an iterative refinement process. you exemplify this process of growth. The richness of your questions and even the ordr in which you put them is a spectacular revelation of how the mind works in its very very constructive manner.
I know I am asking lousy questions. But I have to ask now, somehow, before you run too far ahead.
So far, the content in this thread has been extremely helpful. Thank you very much.