Getting down and dirty is where the rubber meets the road ...

Illustration 3 is the gap that showed up as a consequence of lack of internal person trust as shown on an Excel (ET level) as a set of cells.

Here you see the 10 to 12 leading indicators of the traded instrument.

H1 and H2 refer to the hypotheisiset which is the deductive paradigm basis of PEP.

If a person goes through developing internal person trust as illustrated in the DR. Hu document, then they can make use of the 10 to 12 leading indicators in a timely manner because there is no longer a mentally based incoherence gap.
 

Attachments

Illustration 4 shows the order of sentiment shift events. It is a graphic pictograph replay of the Excel Illustration 3.

So this thread has dealt with about all of the critical thinking ssues associated with learning. at the same time it well explains why most people including Wharton graduates cannot trade for shit.

To trade any successful method a person has to work to build his mind. It is a process of getting neurons to align in such a way that the mind is fully differentiated. We have put on the table the work required to lay the foundation and put the building blocks in place. Work centers on drills where the mind is coherent and goes through the three stages of coherence: awereness, compassion and wisdom.
 

Attachments

ES Monthly Chart - May 29 2010

This closes out the May 2010 bar with decreasing price and increasing volume - outside of the March 2009 retrace right trendline.

Point 3 on Monthly ES chart confirmed in place.
Analysis and decision to place a point 3 was done intrabar with the data set that was provided previously at the time of the last ES Monthly chart posted.
 

Attachments

Quote from TIKITRADER:

ES Monthly Chart - May 29 2010

This closes out the May 2010 bar with decreasing price and increasing volume - outside of the March 2009 retrace right trendline.

Point 3 on Monthly ES chart confirmed in place.
Analysis and decision to place a point 3 was done intrabar with the data set that was provided previously at the time of the last ES Monthly chart posted.

Tnx Tiki for putting up the chart. So we have got PT3 on the SF container and the TF short will look for point 2.

What I don't understand is how you have drawn the pt2 of the TF (dashed dark blue) from Mar 2009 on Jan 2010. According to the chart, shouldn't pt 2 be at June 2009 when you draw the parallel ltl.

emac
 
Quote from emac:

shouldn't pt 2 be at June 2009 when you draw the parallel ltl.

emac


yes . . . This one is an error of placing it incorrectly. Thanks
If you look back you will see slight adjustments from time to time as slopes had fanned or steepened.
It moves so slow I zoned out :D .
 
Quote from jack hershey:

Continually fucking up parallelograms on all levels is not something which needs to continue much longer. for anyone, OCD's excepted. elementary school teachers tell their students to stop fucking up their parallelograms and they stop.

what is nice about an enclosed space is it's certainty.

If aperson is not certain whether priceand volume are in the pattern in the parallelogram, they look elswhere where certainty is found and their mind becomes AWARE of this certainty.

Accepting the certainty leads to taust and and trust leads to more than awareness.

It leads to compassion. I am an example of compassion. what it means to me is that I am certain about whether I am inside a parallelogram or not and I have the advantage that I know that parallelograms overlap.

Lets go through the "boundary conditions" of parallelograms. where does this subject come from? It does not come from the monkey mind. It comes from the minds proclivity for getting anwsers the mind needs to fill in the pieces of what the mind is building.

The test for correctness is "does it fit?" with what is already there through the mind's processing.

A person starts anywhere to do parallelograms. He does it until his mind is finished asking questions it needs answers to to fill in all the pieces of parallelogram annotating.

Why are we working on parallelograms? this is done because the deductive reasoning done in a scientific way came to the deductive conclusion that parallelograms are the only container, they over lap and they contain only one pattrn. the bank loan officer has never been asked at wharton, or anywhere else to think up paradigms or models or anything scientific. Computer scientists do do science but it is according to tenchnilogical hard, soft and other wares. computer scientists "game" learning computer sciences.

Resolution for parallelograms involves just drilling down to the granularity of the markets.

We need to engage markets and making money with each other. We do this through the mind building process.

Awareness of the market's offer becomes more and more clear through the container aspect of the parallelogram. It also becomes more clear by the order of events of the logging. logging is made convenient by having a vocabulary for the columns of the log. and a vocabulary for the parts of the parallelogram and the parts of the p,v pattern.

In one of the meditation centers of the world, fpor 5.000 years about five basic approaches to meditation have gone through systematic refinement. Practitioners take their time.

There are also martial arts that originate in those places. they are interwoven with the meditation based thrusts. In martial arts, success takes care of itself. the practitioner's job is to be very comptent in knowing that he knows what is going on and just using his learned martials arts to succeed. This is precisely parallel to PEP and its applications.

Jack, you hit the nail on the head on this. I think this is where I am - not able to be certain at ALL times of the parallelogram and not able to ask the question to test the correctness of the parallelogram many times during annotation and logging.

You have mentioned on the correct vocabulary for columns of the log and part sof the parallelogram. Would you care to elaborate and provide a picture to illustrate on the vocab for the log columns. For that of the parallelogram, I would believe them to be the cases , Pt 1, 2 , 3, FTT, VE and perhaps BO (FBO) ?

Thanks again for your untiring effort to allow us to learn :) .
 
This is my view of todays chart after review and correcting some mistakes. On hindsight, it is clear after RTH but during the day, questions were many due to uncertainties. I think putting in the right logging would clear alot of things up during charting time.
 

Attachments

Quote from emac:

This is my view of todays chart after review and correcting some mistakes. On hindsight, it is clear after RTH but during the day, questions were many due to uncertainties. I think putting in the right logging would clear alot of things up during charting time.
Or maybe the SF is ...
 

Attachments

Quote from charts:

Or maybe the SF is ...

If the SF is drawn as such, that would mean my earlier PT 1, 2 and 3 is incorrect since the SF PT1 cannot be the PT2 of the previous channel, right ? Hence, the Pt 2 of the long fractal would still be on bar 5 9:55 AM before the VE ?
 
Quote from emac:

If the SF is drawn as such, that would mean my earlier PT 1, 2 and 3 is incorrect since the SF PT1 cannot be the PT2 of the previous channel, right ? Hence, the Pt 2 of the long fractal would still be on bar 5 9:55 AM before the VE ?
Pt 1,2,3 of that same fractal up move could be found on Friday.
 
Back
Top