That's the issue with you; not here. The probability of a virus mutating is proportional to its prevalence. Lowering the rate of transmission decreases the number of mutations that appear in a given period of time. This holds for all viruses, without exception.
As far as mutations and new lines, that cat is mostly out of the bag now. Hopefully. Whatever genetic combination Covid-19 has to offer, we are going to see it, probably no matter what we do.
I suppose it is not all bad news. Democrats will pay a political price for mandates, including losing some union and independent support. Perhaps more significantly, it will be harder to fire up their base to vote, as apparently a significant number of minorities are still vaccine hesitant. As far as the Republican base, they don’t need any firing up. So more votes for Republicans and less turnout of Democrats than otherwise, should swing some otherwise close races. Who knows, maybe if Republicans win enough seats, they may be able run things again, including national health policy.
Lets do some back of napkin math on r0. Not r0 that measures the infectiousness of a virus, rather r0 of virus mutations. Currently, there are over a dozen significant Covid-19 mutations. I’ll use 12 as the current number, although I sure there are more circulating among us right now. Covid-19 arrived at the end of 2019. Call it December of 2019. It is now October, 2021. So 12 major variants in 22 months. However, we only started with 1 variant. Roughly figuring a variant doubling rate of just under every six months gets us to the 12 major Covid-19 variants we see now. If this trend continues, then we are looking at 24 variants by April, 2022, or about 2 new variants per month, on average. Now consider vaccine development time. The last vaccine rush job took about 12 months. I would imagine major Covid-19 variants will plateau soon, if they have not started to already. So in one sense, I may be appearing to offer evidence in support for a vaccine mandate, however it is way too late to make a difference at this point, especially since vaccines may not offer any protection against these new strains. Hopefully my calculations of Covid mutations are grossly inaccurate, but one thing I do have high confidence on is there will be great resentment among those forced to get Covid-19 vaccinations. The resentment will likely cause negative long term economic, social, and political impacts beyond what Covid would do.
There are some lessons we must learn from this pandemic before the next pandemic hits. We must remember the next pandemic may be less “Gentle” than this one.
1. Don’t politicize the virus the nest time. Get the media and politicians on board with this. Not all professional are entitled to “Free speech”, as already known with attorneys and doctors, for example.
2. All countries must take immediate and decisive action simultaneously to reduce the spread of a pathogen of concern. With tens of thousands of people traveling by air, a virus can go global in a matter of hours, not even considering a coordinated terrorist attack.
3. Basic public education must require everyone to become as proficient at crossing the street as avoiding infections. People need to have effective PPE available along with knowing how to properly use PPE. We are still way behind in that regard.
There are other measures, of course. But the items listed above are fundamental.
I’m going to wind up my pandemic related posts. There are only so many ways to say something. Understanding the science behind pathogens can help with predictions and determining the best course of action. However, judgement is still required in determining if a threat is serious enough to go all-in against, sort of what we are doing against Covid. There are only so many times we can go all-in before we permanently wreck our economy and social fabric, so let us save that move for the most dangerous of threats.