Germany introduces Women’s Pants with Safety Alarms to Thwart Off Migrant Sex Attacks

[Frederick Foresight]

That thread was started by GWB, not you.

True enough. But please keep in mind that this is not what I was responding to in my earlier post. I simply observed that you had insulted me while having me on ignore. Not that there's anything wrong with that, except that it is not very consistent with your earlier comment:

You claim to put the guy on ignore and hide behind the veil of the function and toss insults his way?

Who started what thread may be of some import to you, but it had nothing to do with my earlier observation.

 

[Tsing Tao]

True enough. But please keep in mind that this is not what I was responding to in my earlier post. I simply observed that you had insulted me while having me on ignore. Not that there's anything wrong with that, except that it is not very consistent with your earlier comment:

Who started what thread may be of some import to you, but it had nothing to do with my earlier observation.

The comment you quoted:

"I'm assuming this was a response to one of the bleeding hearts/snarkasaurases I have on ignore and not to me. Hard for me to tell because of the missing posts."

where I clarify that AAA's answer was not to me but to one of the folks on ignore hardly calls you out anywhere. I had (at the time) other bleeding hearts, snarky folks on ignore. Quite a few. I know this might come as quite a shock, but I don't give you all that much thought.

Additionally, it is quite different than someone seeking out and going to a thread of someone they supposedly have on ignore to directly call them out on a host of things.

Who started what thread may be of some import to you, but it had nothing to do with my earlier observation.

It's important only because that was the example asked to compare it to this thread. You know, relevance and all that.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

The comment you quoted:

"I'm assuming this was a response to one of the bleeding hearts/snarkasaurases I have on ignore and not to me. Hard for me to tell because of the missing posts."

where I clarify that AAA's answer was not to me but to one of the folks on ignore hardly calls you out anywhere. I had (at the time) other bleeding hearts, snarky folks on ignore. Quite a few. I know this might come as quite a shock, but I don't give you all that much thought.

Additionally, it is quite different than someone seeking out and going to a thread of someone they supposedly have on ignore to directly call them out on a host of things.



It's important only because that was the example asked to compare it to this thread. You know, relevance and all that.

You have attributed "snark" to me more than you have other posters, so what's a person to think?

https://www.elitetrader.com/et/search/7138516/?q=Frederick+Foresight+snark&o=date&c[user][0]=137314

And I was actively participating in that earlier thread, and was being quoted by people whose posts you were able to read. Oh, and then you mentioned "snark." Again. Were you specifically not including me in that snark remark?

 

[Tsing Tao]

You have attributed "snark" to me more than you have other posters, so what's a person to think?

https://www.elitetrader.com/et/search/7138516/?q=Frederick+Foresight+snark&o=date&c[user][0]=137314

And I was actively participating in that earlier thread, and was being quoted by people whose posts you were able to read. Oh, and then you mentioned "snark." Again. Were you specifically not including me in that snark remark?

Not sure who I was referring to. My guess is that was my response about exGOPer. But it could have been you. I've probably attributed "asshole", "jerk", and "shit-for-brains" to you more than most other posters, too, but that doesn't mean any one general use for any of these insults was for you specifically.

Regardless, it's still a lot different than me going to threads you started (while I had you on ignore) to throw insults at you while hiding behind ignore. And that's really the point.

What is it you say to people all the time? Something about "keep digging"?

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Regardless, it's still a lot different than me going to threads you started (while I had you on ignore) to throw insults at you while hiding behind ignore. And that's really the point.

That was your point. It was not mine. And you did not raise your specific point about who started the thread until after I raised my point that you also insulted those you placed on ignore, which was in response to your initial observation about those who do such things. Regardless, I suggest "we" stop "gerrymandering" the debate into winnable arguments.

 

[Tsing Tao]

That was your point. It was not mine. And you did not raise your specific point about who started the thread until after I raised my point that you also insulted those you placed on ignore. Regardless, I suggest "we" stop "gerrymandering" the debate into winnable arguments.

Dude, you inserted yourself into a conversation between me and another poster with the intent of drawing a parallel and saying "see, you do it too!". You failed. I don't blame you for wanting to stop the argument. It's clearly not going where you wanted it to.

Next time, avoid getting involved just to take a shot unless you're specifically looking for a flame war. It's actually not that difficult. Watch: I'll even give you the last word here. Go ahead.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Dude, you inserted yourself into a conversation between me and another poster with the intent of drawing a parallel and saying "see, you do it too!". You failed. I don't blame you for wanting to stop the argument. It's clearly not going where you wanted it to.

Next time, avoid getting involved just to take a shot unless you're specifically looking for a flame war. It's actually not that difficult.

Show me the initial reference to the distinction and relevance of who started the thread as being pertinent to insulting someone on ignore before I quoted what you wrote:

You claim to put the guy on ignore and hide behind the veil of the function and toss insults his way?

I remember you taking the time to insult me a while back when you had me on ignore...

That was my only point. It was only then that you added a twist:

Please show the threads where you began that I went into to insult you while I had you on ignore.

Looks to me like you didn't like the comparison so you changed the argument to suit.

Tired of all the winning yet?

 

[Tsing Tao]

Like a child you shotgun and expect others to interpret you.

 

[Tom B]

Show me the initial reference to the distinction and relevance of who started the thread as being pertinent to insulting someone on ignore before I quoted what you wrote:


That was my only point. It was only then that you added a twist:

Looks to me like you didn't like the comparison so you changed the argument to suit.

Tired of all the winning yet?

Are you tired of losing yet? Stop digging. Pretty soon, you will be known as slarti Jr.

 

[futurecurrents]

As reported by GatewayPundit who are re-reporting from 'Voice Of Europe' who are based in Brussels and are a notorious fake news website who linked to a SINGLE video of 5 seconds that shows a CONCEPT. I could very well say that it's an underwear worn by White House staff from getting their pussies grabbed by Trump and it would be just as factually true.

Conservatism is nothing but a cult of brain dead morons trying out outrage each other over racist and xenophobic crap.

I think this essential, well said fact has been lost amongst all this bickering.

"Conservatism is nothing but a cult of brain dead morons trying out outrage each other over racist and xenophobic crap."

Bingo. The OP is a PRIME example.