Germany introduces Women’s Pants with Safety Alarms to Thwart Off Migrant Sex Attacks

Not sure what any of this means. All I'm attempting to do is clarify how the ignore function works.

Option 2.

You ridiculous thing.

tsingshit.PNG
 
View attachment 181878

And new threads. Tom B is on ignore.

View attachment 181879

Assuming you did not put him on ignore in the first screenshot and then off again in the second in an attempt to paint yourself correct (which is an assumption I cannot be sure of given your past snarky bullshit) then the second screenshot has Tom's threads visible because, as I said originally, you are viewing it from the Forum Browser page instead of the thread browser page.

If you are looking at threads from the forum browser page, you are only looking at the most recent list of 5 threads instead of the thread browser page, which is typically how a user will look for activity.

But again, I've already stated all of this in the post before you were telling me how wrong I was.
 
Option 2.

You ridiculous thing.

View attachment 181880

Whatever you say. You're such a pissy little man that the discussion really is a joke anyway. If you have Tom on ignore, and you "accidentally" click the threads he creates from the forum browser, why do you reply to them at all? You claim to put the guy on ignore and hide behind the veil of the function and toss insults his way?

As I say, you're petty and essentially irrelevant around here. Side show material.
 
Whatever you say. You're such a pissy little man that the discussion really is a joke anyway. If you have Tom on ignore, and you "accidentally" click the threads he creates from the forum browser, why do you reply to them at all? You claim to put the guy on ignore and hide behind the veil of the function and toss insults his way?

As I say, you're petty and essentially irrelevant around here. Side show material.

Wow, now there is a real man pivoting instead of just exercising option 1.

Tom B is on my ignore list to protect he and I from wasting too much time. You may have noticed he is easy to get into a game of thread tennis. I don't hate him. He is petty and small minded etc. however not twisted like others.

So despite it all, if you just admitted your original accusation about me lying about having him on ignore was wrong, then that would be a ray of hope for you. When St Peter looks at your sins, at least you would have this one thing in your good character column.
 
If you have Tom on ignore, and you "accidentally" click the threads he creates from the forum browser, why do you reply to them at all?

Even if you click on a thread from the forum browser, you won't see the posts of anyone on ignore. Trust me, I know because I have all these posters on ignore.

I was traveling recently and using someone else's computer, ie no one on ignore. I couldn't believe how unreadable the forum is with all their trolling. How do you guys tolerate it?
 
Even if you click on a thread from the forum browser, you won't see the posts of anyone on ignore. Trust me, I know because I have all these posters on ignore.

I was traveling recently and using someone else's computer, ie no one on ignore. I couldn't believe how unreadable the forum is with all their trolling. How do you guys tolerate it?

Correct but you may see that they HAVE POSTED just with a blank post sometimes. Other times there is no post at all. A regular glitch.

Another typical GOPper behavior, knowing a fellow is in trouble with facts, jump in to blur the matter.

View attachment 181878

And new threads. Tom B is on ignore.

View attachment 181879
 
Last edited:
Whatever you say. You're such a pissy little man that the discussion really is a joke anyway. If you have Tom on ignore, and you "accidentally" click the threads he creates from the forum browser, why do you reply to them at all? You claim to put the guy on ignore and hide behind the veil of the function and toss insults his way?

As I say, you're petty and essentially irrelevant around here. Side show material.
I would not waste any more time with him. He is a compulsive liar. He will spend all day going back and forth with you, lying the entire time. He is basically exGOPer Jr.
 
We can bring in the admin if you wish. Or you can simply admit you don't have Tom on ignore.

Disregard, I've asked Baron/Magna to clarify.
People need to stop lying about their use of the Ignore function. I have explained it in detail here, but I will summarize it again by simply saying once you place someone on Ignore you cannot see anything they post.
 
Back
Top