Quote from peilthetraveler:
I dont know that they lost their life savings. Says the article they lost 2 million and they they were all wealthy. But basically what you are saying is that if you ever do a business with someone and you dont make money, you have the right to torture that person?
Lets apply that logic to housing. Lets say you bought a house in 2006 and the home went down in value from say 350k to 200k. Now lets say you are a decent guy and not a deadbeat in this scenario and you decide to keep paying on the mortgage. Should the bank have the right to kidnap and torture you because now the loan that they gave you is more than the house is worth? Because now the bank cant sell your loan to anyone for anywhere near what the face value is. Isnt it YOUR fault for buying that house at the peak. So shouldnt the bank get to torture you even though YOU did nothing wrong and it was purely the economic conditions that caused the house to go down in value?