Georgia's reopening is a high-stakes public health bet -- and will likely please Trump

States are following the best public health policy for their re-openings and should continue to do so. This is not "doomer narrative" it is about following the best scientific policy to successfully re-open a state and economy.

I support states following a phased re-opening using the best public health policies to guide their plans -- this is not a "don't reopen or deaths will be on your hands!" approach - I fully support re-opening and applaud the efforts in my state to re-open is a phased manner.

If the "science" was settled, you might have a leg to stand on in this argument. But the problem is the "science" and the "experts" are proving flawed - in some cases greatly so. And this was the data used to create policy. Then we were told that reopening now would essentially bring about thousands and thousands of deaths from doing so. Also not happening. You're one doomer, but there are many out there like you - many far more rabid as well. And thus far, they're all wrong.
 
pity you make cheap shot bullshit and actually quite stupid arguments...

1. 30 days ago to 14 days ago... what do you see. That is why I went back to your garbage fear and doom original post and forward... to the point where the data is not in the window. Do you understand now?

you have been and idiot... on Covid thread after thread lately.
In just the last 3 to 4 days... you claimed RO is universal
and you claimed individuals are not super spreaders...

So don't tell me what I understand or don't understand... We found you are wrong or you just made shit up about the last 5 or the last 6 times I challenged you. You are wrong on the big issues just about every time when Covid is concerned.

It is amazing that you still don’t understand the sham of adding increased cases 14 days later while deliberately underreporting current data to make the recent trend look always like its declining. Glad you enjoy illusions rather than reality.

We will come back in 14 days and see what these values have been adjusted to — as well as if the updated data for date range shows any type of decline.
 
pity you make cheap shot bullshit and actually quite stupid arguments...

1. 30 days ago to 14 days ago... what do you see. That is why I went back to your garbage fear and doom original post.

you have been and idiot... on Covid thread after thread lately.
In just the last 3 to 4 days... you claimed RO is universal
and you claimed individuals are not super spreaders...

So don't tell me what I understand or don't understand... We found you are wrong or you just made shit up about the last 5 or the last 6 times I challenged you. You are wrong on the big issues just about every time when Covid is concerned.

13 more days until we see an example of what a sham the Georgia data is.

BTW -- once again a superspreader is an event at a location during a time period. It is not an individual who is "super infectious." Every person has the same unmitigated Rnaught infection rate for COVID-19. Some individuals are not magically more infectious than others when they have COVID-19 -- except for mitigation related to their own personal behavior such as wearing a mask which reduces the probability of them infecting others.
 
13 more days until we see an example of what a sham the Georgia data is.

BTW -- once again a superspreader is an event at a location during a time period. It is not an individual who is "super infectious." Every person has the same unmitigated Rnaught infection rate for COVID-19. Some individuals are not magically more infectious than others when they have COVID-19 -- except for mitigation related to their own personal behavior such as wearing a mask which reduces the probability of them infecting others.

By the way, I am totally fine admitting my prognostication was in error if it shows a significant spike in data from reopening. This does not mean I will waver on my belief that being open is better than being closed no matter what (the combined economic, social and psychological impacts). But I'll be just fine saying I was wrong.

The question is, will you?
 
By the way, I am totally fine admitting my prognostication was in error if it shows a significant spike in data from reopening. This does not mean I will waver on my belief that being open is better than being closed no matter what (the combined economic, social and psychological impacts). But I'll be just fine saying I was wrong.

The question is, will you?

Brazil never locked down. Give me your feedback on how things are going in Brazil.
 
My gosh are you an anti science moron on this stuff.

I gave you a link to an academic paper on Science direct where they defined super spreader as an individual and then identified situations in which Superspreaders spread.

Some SARS superspreaders were high risk types at the time of the superspreading event.

But, you refuse to take in science which counters your "beliefs"

You are crazy fearful and stupid when it comes to Covid.
You make shit up and you don't even adjust when there is contrary facts and science.

And yeah the papers said some Super Spreaders shed much more of the virus.
They are not entirely sure why...
A different paper said with HIV, some Super Spreaders had infections in their urethra.
With SARS some already had pre existing conditions related to their lungs.
I can not believe you just make shit up and act like is true.

You are a nut bag. Some super spreading events (maybe most or all - i would have to do more research to see if it is all) are created by SuperSpreader individuals and some of them do spread much more of the virus... They shed more and it is frequently related to a pre-existing conditions.




13 more days until we see an example of what a sham the Georgia data is.

BTW -- once again a superspreader is an event at a location during a time period. It is not an individual who is "super infectious." Every person has the same unmitigated Rnaught infection rate for COVID-19. Some individuals are not magically more infectious than others when they have COVID-19 -- except for mitigation related to their own personal behavior such as wearing a mask which reduces the probability of them infecting others.
 
Last edited:
Brazil never locked down. Give me your feedback on how things are going in Brazil.

Better than Spain, Italy, France, the UK, the US or other countries with a higher death per 1M pop that did lock down.

What was it you wanted my opinion on?
 
Better than Spain, Italy, France, the UK, the US or other countries with a higher death per 1M pop that did lock down.

What was it you wanted my opinion on?

The quickly rising death count...
Brazil Counts Almost Twice As Many Daily Covid-19 Deaths As The U.S.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/carlie...daily-covid-19-deaths-as-the-us/#55806db7610b

The poor leadership...
Brazil’s Bolsonaro could soon be toppled, analysts say, as coronavirus cases surge
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/27/cor...onaro-could-soon-be-toppled-analysts-say.html
 
Back
Top