you are so full of shit.. just yesterday you admited R0 is estimated and can not be determined accurately until the epidemic is over.
What you are citing is a bunch of attempts to estimate R0 using a failed model and frequently using very bad data from China.
Its not real.
What is real is the virus is not following the growth model in places which are coming out of lockdown... and Sweden which was not in lockdown.
nothing you believe makes any sense in light of real world data yet you still bullshit your ass off.
you beliefs are countered by the data yet you refuse to change them.
Why are Sweden's deaths trending down.
Why hasn't almost everyone in stockholm gotten Covid?
your models are garbage.
What you are citing is a bunch of attempts to estimate R0 using a failed model and frequently using very bad data from China.
Its not real.
What is real is the virus is not following the growth model in places which are coming out of lockdown... and Sweden which was not in lockdown.
nothing you believe makes any sense in light of real world data yet you still bullshit your ass off.
you beliefs are countered by the data yet you refuse to change them.
Why are Sweden's deaths trending down.
Why hasn't almost everyone in stockholm gotten Covid?
your models are garbage.
There are several million references in Google of scientific papers and articles placing the Rnaught of COVID-19 above 2. Go do a search and read them.
Let' there also be an understanding that Rnaught is about the infection spread. The spread is the same for old people as young people - except the old are likely to have worse medical outcomes after being infected.
A cruise ship with no mitigation in place in a closed environment (mirroring the definition of Rnaught) is one of the best environments for arriving at a Rnaught figure.