Georgia gives middle finger to First Amendment

[Slartibartfast]

Here's a couple of smoke-out questions.

-which party hates the state of israel?
-which party is gung ho to stop russia, russia, russia?
-which party backs are intel agencies that want desperately to foment hegemonic wars all over the globe?

If you can answer these questions truthfully, which i doubt, you'll have your answer as to where to find those who resemble nazis.

We have already established you identify as a NAZI.

Not the first day we did this either is it FHL? Poor memory I guess.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Why would I feel compelled to respond to his comment? You mean other than the fact he directed his comment at me?

Only if you identify with Nazis, which you evidently do. Best to reread the post you responded to, and question your visceral reaction.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

I fail to see how I am trying to have it both ways. My sole comment was that people who speak on a particular topic should not be persecuted. End of story.

Words have meaning. People using them should conduct themselves accordingly.

Hypothetically speaking, if I had an employee who outed himself as, say, a white supremacist on social media or elsewhere, or tried to instigate violence for another group, whatever that group might be, he would not be long for the company.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Words have meaning. People using them should conduct themselves accordingly.

Hypothetically speaking, if I had an employee who outed himself as, say, a white supremacist on social media or elsewhere, or tried to instigate violence for another group, whatever that group might be, he would not be long for the company.

The problem with your comment is that pesky first amendment we have here in the States. If you and I agree that white supremacist speaking should be punished, where do we draw the line on what is acceptable? Who gets to draw that line?

 

[Slartibartfast]

The problem with your comment is that pesky first amendment we have here in the States. If you and I agree that white supremacist speaking should be punished, where do we draw the line on what is acceptable? Who gets to draw that line?

Not the white supremacist.

 

[fhl]

Words have meaning. People using them should conduct themselves accordingly.

Hypothetically speaking, if I had an employee who outed himself as, say, a white supremacist on social media or elsewhere, or tried to instigate violence for another group, whatever that group might be, he would not be long for the company.

But your perfectly willing to play team tag on here with a scumbag that wants to punch a nazi for speaking.

Gee, should I take that as evidence as to who you really are or the self righteous statement you made in this post without any evidence at all.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

The problem with your comment is that pesky first amendment we have here in the States. If you and I agree that white supremacist speaking should be punished, where do we draw the line on what is acceptable? Who gets to draw that line?

If I were an employer, I would invariably also have employees who are not "white." Such public disclosure by a white supremacist would create an unhealthy environment not conducive to productivity and profitability. There would be discord. People can have their own views, but if they are repugnant views then they should expect to be held to account.

If you are too scared, worrying about drawing lines then you will never draw them and then anything goes. That's not how civilized society works. And if you can't draw a line at, say, white supremacists, then what are you good for? You can have your views but be prepared to take responsibility for them and hope that there are enough like-minded people who will give you cover. Because not everyone will.

 

[fhl]

Not the white supremacist.

Black live matters, I presume. The group that agitates for segregated living quarters in universities, and classes discussing what's the matter with white people, among literally dozens of other such direct racist demands.

You ignoramouses have gotten away with this kabookyspeak for so long that you actually believe your own sniveling, nonsensical rhetoric.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

But your perfectly willing to play team tag on here with a scumbag that wants to punch a nazi for speaking.

Yes, perfectly willing. And between the two of you, he is not the one who is the scumbag. I'll let you work that out.

 

[Slartibartfast]

Black live matters, I presume. The group that agitates for segregated living quarters in universities, and classes discussing what's the matter with white people, among literally dozens of other such direct racist demands.

You ignoramouses have gotten away with this kabookyspeak for so long that you actually believe your own sniveling, nonsensical rhetoric.

We don't live in a world of absurdist logic. I don't anyway.

There are things we in Western society have learned, to the cost of hundreds of millions of lives.

NAZIs we punch. Why? because it would be spitting on the graves of our dead ancestors to be that fucking stupid not to. They were an oddity of the 1st, they would have been proscribed (emblems etc.) had ANYONE seriously thought after WWII that in such a short time that evil would return.

Antifa exist as a reaction to fascism. You don't have fascism, you don't have anti-fascism. The first groups were founded a year after Fascist ideology took form.

BLM is a different movement, again reacting to real, absolutely real, institutional racism in the USA. Should they develop into something else, they will be pushed back but they are just like 1000 other groups that are never co-cohesive enough to literally try and take over the world.

I agree wholeheartedly, there is too much fringe left going on, but it is largely irritating and narcissistic clap-trap.

NAZIs don't get a 2nd chance and don't get to play the victim. Not after the megadeath carnage you know?