Idiot. He's talking about some degree of socialism, and not a repressive authoritarian regime. You seem to favor those, at least of another kind.
Not single-handedly and solely. But there is joint culpability as I see it, at least in the moral if not legal sense.You are single handedly laying all violence solely at the feet of the NRA and that is so disingenuous as to almost completely disqualify the statement.

I'm not convinced they anticipated this kind of deliberate obfuscation and mutation:Again, some person (or government body made up of persons) has to be the judge of this. The problem there is that the decision can take the slant of the individual(s) in charge. Thus, only an absolute can be decided on. The Founding Fathers knew this, and were quite brilliant about it.
So to sum up, violently putting down speech you don't like and gov't run health care is not authoritarianism. Real authoritarianism is apparently such things as free speech rallies and a private mkt in health care.
Have you ever actually listened to the arguments you make?
Not single-handedly and solely. But there is joint culpability as I see it, at least in the moral if not legal sense.
Pot calling Kettle. Let us know when you are able to have conversation without deflection. Thank you for your time.You're an ideologue. Your thinking has ended long ago.
Yeah, really. Please let us know what is the net result of your CL trading in your CL Journal.Pot calling Kettle. Let us know when you are able to have conversation without deflection. Thank you for your time.
Yeah, really. Please let us know what is the net result of your CL trading in your CL Journal?