Quote from crgarcia:
Equilibrium applies best only to markets that deal with known quantities. But financial markets deal with quantities that are not only largely unknown but unknowable. They discount a future that is contingent on how the financial markets assess it at present. The appropriate concept, in my view, is reflexivity, not equilibrium. Reflexive processes are not just unpredictable; they are genuinely indeterminate because the outcomes depend on the predictions that investors have made. The process may be self-correcting, in which case you tend toward equilibrium, or it can be initially self-reinforcing but eventually self-defeating, in which case you have a boom and a bust.
http://www.geocities.com/ecocorner/intelarea/gs5.html
Quote from crgarcia:
Most will fail (and this is 100% predictable) because the odds are vastly against short term traders.
This has nothing to do with me.
Quote from crgarcia:
Most will fail (and this is 100% predictable) because the odds are vastly against short term traders.
This has nothing to do with me.

Virtually all short-term traders are losers.Quote from R. Raskolnikov:
CRGARCIA is a LOSING trader.
Losing traders almost always think that it's a scam because they couldn't figure it out. It's the only way they can accept failure. It must be impossible right?![]()
