Are those really suckers...Suckers pay good money to hear him speak
He's clearly very fond of himself, heavy narcissistic traits.
Have you actually listened to what he has to say? Asking because I have listened to dozens of hours of him and couldn’t disagree with what you say more.Peterson had a few decent ideas at first but most of what he says is a bunch of nonsense. Suckers pay good money to hear him speak though, good business. He's clearly very fond of himself, heavy narcissistic traits.
As with most religions, it was about controlling people. What do you do if you have a peasant working for nothing, how do you stop him from killing the lords and stealing the gold? Tell him he'll go to hell.
Have you actually listened to what he has to say?
He's been described as "The professor of piffle" ...
"You may say, 'Well, dragons don't exist'. It's, like, yes they do — the category predator and the category dragon are the same category. It absolutely exists. It's a superordinate category. It exists absolutely more than anything else. In fact, it really exists. What exists is not obvious." Jordan Peterson
... and not that hard to see why.
Who exactly is calling him the professor of piffle? Uber Leftist politically correct trans genders that are more than willing to slander anyone who doesnt have the latest list of nonbinary gender identities memorized.
No, not that, just a fellow University colleague.
But instead of hurling silly political insults in defense of JP's gobbledygook, can you explain how his actual words and their commonly understood meanings in that dragon nonsense he came up with make any sense?
Literal translations are for small minds...
not everything that exists is obvious.
The video posted above should answer your question nicely.
Then it cannot be obvious a thing exists.
Yet he states a thing "absolutely exists".
One must presume he doesn't take himself literally either.
But it doesn't. He utters 'the bleedin obvious' then tacks on to it a bunch of trite nonsense and made up opinion with no rational support. Just his literal opinions.
"Jordan Peterson appears very profound and has convinced many people to take him seriously. Yet he has almost nothing of value to say. This should be obvious to anyone who has spent even a few moments critically examining his writings and speeches, which are comically befuddled, pompous, and ignorant. They are half nonsense, half banality. In a reasonable world, Peterson would be seen as the kind of tedious crackpot that one hopes not to get seated next to on a train."
https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/03/the-intellectual-we-deserve