GDP Grows at 3.2% Another Left Wing Hoax Crumbles

Actually when it was all said and done, and the major bugs were out, the cost was about 2 billion. This seems a bit high to me. Its between 6 and 7 bucks for each person. I would have thought it could be done for about half that. But when amortized over a few years it is really not that bad. Wasn't it a Canadian owned company that had the main contract?

Canadian company? If so, was US public money being used to fund Liberal political efforts in other countries? Did the money paid to this Canadian company fund Justin Trudeau’s rise to power and increasing Liberalism’s rise to prominence in Canada? Why was a US website designer not used? It certaintly wasn’t about saving money, was it? What is the initial cost of similar private sector national or global online websites? Pennies per user?

Let the investigations begin on both sides of the border.
 
The rate of improvement in the GDP declined once Trump was elected compared to what it was during the Obama administration.

Huh?

The rate of GDP growth was decelerating in Obama's last year. It went from 2.3% in Q2, to 1.9% in Q3 to 1.8% in Q4 of 2016.
 
Canadian company? If so, was US public money being used to fund Liberal political efforts in other countries? Did the money paid to this Canadian company fund Justin Trudeau’s rise to power and increasing Liberalism’s rise to prominence in Canada? Why was a US website designer not used? It certaintly wasn’t about saving money, was it? What is the initial cost of similar private sector national or global online websites? Pennies per user?

Let the investigations begin on both sides of the border.
Because something is a good idea, and we end up doing it, does not necessarily mean it is being done "to fund Liberal Political efforts in other countries." A problem for your way of thinking, I would guess, is that "liberal" Canada is a country on the rise, much as the U.S. was in the 1950s; yet you have plighted your troth, so to speak, with a would be, budding "White Nationalist Country".

The U.S. is currently going down the dark road of nationalism and is clearly in decline in respect to its obedience to law and democratic principles. To recognize that something is seriously wrong, you will only need to look at the surprising number of people who recognize that our President is a criminal gangster, and yet are perfectly ok with this. My advice to you is to take your next summer vacation in "liberal" Canada. You won't want to leave! It represents everything you hold dear, but apparently can't fathom why.
 
Inherited from Obama

View attachment 201589

Don't be swayed by these fake numbers.

The reason Obama had low unemployment is because they counted those who applied for a job as employed, regardless if he/she got the job or fired later.

Even with such a 'trick' by the Obama's administration, Trump's managed to overtake Obama's numbers.
 
Don't be swayed by these fake numbers.

The reason Obama had low unemployment is because they counted those who applied for a job as employed, regardless if he/she got the job or fired later.

Even with such a 'trick' by the Obama's administration, Trump's managed to overtake Obama's numbers.


Source that verifies that and that it is different for other presidents.
 
Source that verifies that and that it is different for other presidents.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/10/donald-lambro-obama-hides-jobs-failure-by-not-coun/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterf...-be-fooled-the-obama-unemployment-rate-is-11/

The trick is that when those 5 million are not counted as in the work force, they are not counted as unemployed either. They may desperately need and want jobs. They may be in poverty, as many undoubtedly are, with America suffering today more people in poverty than in the entire half century the Census Bureau has been counting poverty. But they are not even counted in that 8.3% unemployment rate that Obama and his media cheerleaders were so tirelessly celebrating last week.

If they were counted, the unemployment rate today would be a far more realistic 11%, better reflecting the suffering in the real economy under Obamanomics.
 
Back
Top