Quote from atticus:
lol, no. I have stated repeatedly that I DO NOT DISPUTE the time and sales. 215.58 printed before and after your post. You're trying very hard to be Jon Lovitz here.
I dispute you actually sold 216.92 and covered at 215.58. My rationale has been outlined, ad nauseum.
I'll ask one last time. Please post proof of your fills and I will graciously and thoughtfully apologize.
I have no fill to prove, as my only trades have been neutral deltas in eurjpy exotics. None of which was posted here, let alone hours after the fact. I will happily post my blotter if you can assert and argue that I've posted any trade [of the hundreds on ET] in hindsight.
Actually you did state very clearly that I could not have exited after 9:20am. Your exact words here:
"In fact, GBPJPY had already passed your 215.58 exit when you posted your 216.92 short at 9:20 EDT"
and here:
"I understand your point, but he posted the 216.92 short AFTER his buy to close price had been hit."
and here:
"He posted the opening 216.92 short after his profitable exit-to-close was touched. GBPJPY went up like a dot-shot from there and the 215.58 print was not seen again."
and here:
"Bullshit, GBPJPY was trading under your fantasy short-cover before your 9:20 post. Nice of you to post the entry after the price has met your exit parm."
The fact that your statements where proven wrong by the FACTS changed your tune to "BS, I just don't believe you" and thats fine by me even if it is rather infantile. If you're going to play Net Cop just have the facts correct before calling BS on someone.
"9:20amEDT: Posted a new, short to open a position at 216.92. Price was trading 215.45-215.70"
The short was taken hours before that post. Quite obvious right?
"10:30amEDT: Posted his 215.58 exit. Price was trading 216.35."
Already covered this one.
"I dispute you actually sold 216.92 and covered at 215.58. My rationale has been outlined, ad nauseum."
I've quoted your outline above and the facts prove your rationale wrong and flawed. Now if you want to restate and simply say "Nah, Nah, Nah, Nah, I don't believe you" thats a whole different story.
As far as blotter go. I have no idea what a blotter is, hence my statement. thought you wanted PnL and there is a snowball's chance in hell thats getting posted.
Who the hell is Jon Lovitz? Like I care.
"The vast majority of his posts prove them same."
Care to elaborate - with proof?
In any case, heres the pissing match which was apparrently caused by my pointing out the title of this thread. I was right to do so if in fact this is to be a GY thread. No? I suppose that is to deep of a concept for some. I have no vested interest in this thread other than a curious distraction. You guys want to trash it, be my guest - Doesn't effect my PnL one bit.