Van you seem afraid of data. Think of every companies prospects and every note and mention on them, they all go into this mind as data. And you are very lucky because this mind filters through all the nonsense and gives you just the most relevant, actionable info. I check for Price targets and I check for last mentions and I never follow an analyst who is chasing a price. I go deeper than any other news assimilation site and then not only recommend the idea, I put my own money on it and prosper greatly.
If you had followed each and every move of this mind from the last thread to now you would owe the Us Gov $250K dollars as I did. (Overall bill actually $500K when you incorporate this year's qtrlies)
You may not want that. I know I don't ever again want to make as much as in the last year-- it's not worth it. I spend as much as I trade and after the taxes I have very little left. They wiped me out.
So good or bad, you have before you one of Wall Streets last idea men.. The 'Barker' or Shouter this is a position that no longer exists in the finance world but you used to be able to work for a major house without a series 17 or whatever they used to ask me for, and you could simply call up the best ideas and every one would follow you. They follow you because you have that ability to flow with the info and news and mass amounts of data and out Quant a Quant which is a rare ability.
That is the reason you here on this thread. In case you were wondering.. but I enjoy the banter as well. ~si
Stoney here's the thing brother, you can't just evaluate a stock based on the fact that it sounds good and you think the future holds a place for the concept.
I mean yes, innovative ideas/business models are great... but how many times have I wrote the following(?):
a business is a business is a business.
It's like DriveShack. You totally ignored the fundamentals and went on and on about parties and golf for the 'great re-open'. Sure, they can be busy as all get out, but does that justify valuing a company at 10X what its actually worth?!
You get mad at me for pinging you on the cut and pastes. You counter it with "I take it all in".
Well.... then you need to also learn how to read a financial statement.
Period.
These stocks go up on stupid money... but THEY ALWAYS COME DOWN.
Look at Affirm. WRAP. And tons of others.
I have no idea how you made $500K last year. You must have sold some you've held forever, but it wasn't off our last thread.
Let me send you down a rabbit-hole for a few.
Last week UTZ bought a tortilla chip operation out of Michigan. Read the details. They paid like 3X ebitda for the company.
Smart. A good CEO.
That's the way you buy a company.
3X ebitda.
You pay what its actually worth.
Now why in the world would someone recommend buying a company at 200X ebitda?
I mean for a biotech, yes. If you know what's up and what lies ahead with a reasonable amount of expertise. And maybe for a software company, the incremental cost of one more widget is nil. But one has to look at everything else before they buy in. Sure, maybe get lucky and catch a spike on a flavor of the day pumping media pump... but in the end Stoney...
water seeks its level. And that's another one I've written dozens of times.
So whatever.
There's trades, and then there's granny stocks.
Trades are hype.
Granny stocks are for long term wealth creation.