GBA's "2021 Stock Phantasma"

Ahhhh.
$195.75.
Stop it out at $198.67.
I still think it'll drop tomorrow.
But maybe not. We'll see.
+++++++++++++++++++++++

Stoney!
Quit blogging for the Jets and get back to work.
 
hahaha i would definitely like to see stoney as a jets blogger.
Whatever.
Waste of time and money imo.

The mighty Slinger bag Company traded a whopping 1400 shares today.... and was down 2.5%.
..."On light volume."

GOED finished green. That $2.48 level stands tall.

Funko closed at $17.42, but its up 300% from its 52 week low. NFT's and all.

DriveShack lives at $2.50... they should incorporate tennis ball launching tennis bags.... plus free beer and pizza. Then issue a press release.

...and if WRAP.... if it ever breaks $9 again in our lifetime....
....ahhhh never mind.
:rolleyes:

He is the biotech king though.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Stoney!!!!
If QURE hits $27.09 tomorrow.... it gets the blessing!
I'm trusting you on this one.
Btw... ELYS finished green.
Double down at $3.80
 
bloomberg has a good article on some of softbank's current difficulties (quoted below). i believe softbank can start selling their coupang share in september, but i want to go through the paperwork to make sure about that. right now i just have this old article that says it https://investorplace.com/2021/04/could-softbanks-recent-success-be-undoing-cpng-stock/

__________

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/a...iquidate-assets-to-meet-its-growing-debt-pile

"The last time SoftBank’s current ratio was this low, in September 2018, it got out of the hole by offloading shares, including the $4 billion sale of its position in Indian e-commerce startup Flipkart, as well as stakes in U.S. and Japanese telecom operators T-Mobile US Inc. and SoftBank Corp. At that time, the company also used its holdings of Nvidia Corp. — bought in the open market well before the Arm deal — and Alibaba as backing for more loans.

But most of those assets are unavailable now. SoftBank could keep borrowing against Alibaba, but that well is almost dry. Instead, it will likely need to offset the most liquid of its holdings, which include a $5.6 billion stake quietly built in Amazon.com Inc., $812 million of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., and$702 millionin PayPal Holdings Inc."

Then there are the unicorns. Most of the big names in the Vision Fund have already listed — among the most recent being the June offering of Chinese ride-sharing provider Didi Global Inc., food-delivery operator DoorDash Inc. and Coupang. SoftBank still holds onto its stakes in these companies, but that will need to change as debt payments loom."

ok, i got out the good old S-1 for Coupang and found this after the lock-up chart:

"In addition to the restrictions contained in the lock-up agreements described above, we have entered into agreements with certain security holders that contain market stand-off provisions imposing restrictions on the ability of such security holders to offer, sell, or transfer our equity securities for a period of up to 180 days following the date of this prospectus."

i'm imagining that's where Softbank is, but I still haven't found that listed in a doc. 180 days would put it about Sept 6 or 7 i believe.
 
Van ELYS is a piece of crap you got me in at $5.

Really down on that pick. People looking at me like I'm crazy I had a low vol alternative I sold albeit at a big gain. Now what! I look like a fool at the hedge fund! I'm afraid to even look up ELMS for the same reason. How have I gotten here?

Lets get one thing perfectly straight here-- I BLOG FOR THE GIANTS.
 
  • The White House’s plan to offer COVID-19 booster shots to almost all vaccinated Americans starting next month is raising concerns among health experts.
  • Scientists and experts are of the opinion that Biden administration is rushing ahead without enough data and regulatory oversight - Bloomberg.
  • “Endorsing boosters before FDA changes the EUA or grants full approval is actually endorsing something that is not currently permissible under the law,” said Holly Fernandez Lynch, a University of Pennsylvania bioethicist. “Any use beyond the specific terms of the EUA would be unauthorized.”
  • “This is not something that’s generally done by the administration or by political actors,” said Dorit Reiss, a professor who studies vaccine policy at the University of California Hastings College of the Law. “If they are going to circumvent the process, then I’m very concerned.”
  • The decision to have booster shots so early isn’t science-based, vaccine researcher Anna Durbin told STAT News. “I think there’s this tidal wave building that’s based on anxiety. And I don’t think it’s based on scientific evidence that a booster is needed.”
  • “I would have preferred that this had been vetted a little bit more,” said Paul Offit, a vaccine expert from Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, who is on an expert committee that advises the FDA on vaccines. “This just seems to be a declaration without the kind of vetting you would like to have seen.”
NO BOOSTER-
 
Back
Top