Gauntlet Mini™ Promo, 40% Off $25,000 Account

no, I specifically named "trading arcades". I was very specific. You seem to love to change the meaning and intent of your conversation partner. Not a great habit...

Then answer this, what is the point of comparing scammers to a legit business?

Would you compare Instaforex to Interactive Brokers?
 
lol, I don't think you know what you are talking about anymore. Agitate for the fun of it? I am out, no interest to waste more of my time. I made my point clear , you disagree. All good.

Then answer this, what is the point of comparing scammers to a legit business?

Would you compare Instaforex to Interactive Brokers?
 
Its a perfectly valid comparison. Getting funded and hence passing the requirements is pure and utter luck for beginning traders. Any beginner who is truly skilled would never ever use this service. They would learn by themselves and they would have worked hard enough to have put enough money aside to, later on, open a small live account. It comes down almost purely to luck. And that is exactly what happens with a lottery ticket. I am not saying that subscribers of those services, on the other hand, are stupid or lazy. It amazes me again and again how some people pay money for completely unnecessary services yet have a hard time to save money for a larger future purchase/investment.

Whoever said this was for beginner traders? We don't market to beginner traders, and we certainly don't and never did recommend the Gauntlet Mini to beginner traders. If you are just beginning to trade, the Gauntlet Mini is not for you!
 
lol, I don't think you know what you are talking about anymore. Agitate for the fun of it? I am out, no interest to waste more of my time. I made my point clear , you disagree. All good.

You still haven't answered my initial question, sorry your feelings got hurt during this argument.
 
And this is the crux of those services, they can't lose. If they truly believed in training up beginners and picking the profitable ones, do you think they would market some fun paper trading accounts? Hell no, they would be funded with hundreds of millions and employ those profitable traders that would generate unheard profits. Not happening. Those services sell something a beginner can do himself, hence there is very little value in the paper trading account or other ancillary services. The main justification for those horrendous monthly fees are the prospect of some unrealistic hopes.

Just wanted to share my two cents.

With all due respect, your two cents are but one side of a five cent coin. Our company has forthrightly made it's case that it generates money on educational subscriptions and examinations. We've never said otherwise and you can go back through the threads and see it for yourself. The idea however that the prop firm has no interest in acquiring profitable traders is just nonsense. The prop firm absolutely wants profitable traders. It doesn't put it's money up and fund traders for the fun of it.
 
Looks like you directly target beginners.

upload_2020-4-15_21-23-22.png


Whoever said this was for beginner traders? We don't market to beginner traders, and we certainly don't and never did recommend the Gauntlet Mini to beginner traders. If you are just beginning to trade, the Gauntlet Mini is not for you!
 

Attachments

  • upload_2020-4-15_21-21-37.png
    upload_2020-4-15_21-21-37.png
    142 KB · Views: 5
a) That is exactly the point, you are an educational firm but that is not the reason your subscribers flock to you, they subscribe and pay because a big fat carrot is dangling right in front of their noses, a carrot called hope.

b) I never said you have no interest in acquiring profitable traders. My point was that I am doubtful you are sufficiently equipped or funded to sustain highly profitable traders who qualify for larger accounts later on. Hence a beginner pays hundreds of dollars with the hope of getting funded, once funded (if ever), the prospects are very slim to get anything else but a small-sized account. Please provide your financials and funding if you disagree and try to convince me or others otherwise. I believe you will reply that you don't have the interest to convince me. Standard reply. Bottom line, no proof of financial strength or funding amounts.

With all due respect, your two cents are but one side of a five cent coin. Our company has forthrightly made it's case that it generates money on educational subscriptions and examinations. We've never said otherwise and you can go back through the threads and see it for yourself. The idea however that the prop firm has no interest in acquiring profitable traders is just nonsense. The prop firm absolutely wants profitable traders. It doesn't put it's money up and fund traders for the fun of it.
 
Looks like you directly target beginners.

View attachment 225017

Did you even check their website? And now you are saying i don't know what i am talking about?

They are targeting beginners for their beginner crash course and bootcamp. If you would have checked their website you can see a time schedule for their bootcamp and trading a Gauntlet in their bootcamp done after 120 days. The first 2 stages are education and practice.

Now you are comparing their beginner crash course and bootcamp (which are targeted to beginners) to their Gauntlet (which is not targeted to beginners).
 
And that you are in direct cahoots with this service should be perfectly apparent by now. On ignore.

Did you even check their website? And now you are saying i don't know what i am talking about?

They are targeting beginners for their beginner crash course and bootcamp. If you would have checked their website you can see a time schedule for their bootcamp and trading a Gauntlet in their bootcamp done after 120 days. The first 2 stages are education and practice.

Now you are comparing their beginner crash course and bootcamp (which are targeted to beginners) to their Gauntlet (which is not targeted to beginners).
 
Back
Top