Hi guys,
Can someone explain me this
Why gamma hedging results in (x^2 + x)/2
Thank you
Can someone explain me this
Why gamma hedging results in (x^2 + x)/2
Thank you
X is price changeI've seen the formula for covering theta,where x equals the move in the underlying where one gamma hedges..
What is X in your formula?
x= √[($theta * 2)/100
I assume x is the change in the underlying price? You can derive it from the overall PnL approximationHi guys,
Can someone explain me this
Why gamma hedging results in (x^2 + x)/2
Thank you
pnl ~= dS * delta + 0.5 * gamma * dS^2 + theta * dt + vega * dVol
delta(dS) = delta(0) + gamma * dS
Because other second derivatives for most options aren’t going to be significant enough, while gamma will be. I am also completely omitting some other risks like rho and sensitivity to dividends because they are less important in most cases - however, if you are short a 10-year option on SPX you’re gonna learn these two intimately.in your so called approx may i ask why are u including second order dS but truncating all the other derivatives at order 1. surely just delta+theta+vega.