G7 minus 1

I am asking you to show us what you find 'inaccurate'.

I do find an inaccuracy and I will gladly share. But first I’m trying to gauge whether you, as a Trump supporter, have the knowledge of NATO funding to see it, or if you do have the knowledge and you’re just willfully ignoring it because you’re caught up in the cult of personality that is Donald Trump.

I find Trump supporter’s psychology and aptitude interesting.
 
upload_2018-6-11_10-29-18.png


This is 2017 only. An average of the last 8 years puts US spend at 4.06%. For Germany, that 8 year average is 1.3%.

UsualName will likely point out some technically incorrect data in the tweet, or the fact that it did not mention a time period, etc. That's all he can go for.
 
I find Trump supporter’s psychology and aptitude interesting.

I find liberal psychology, and aptitude, and attitude, incredibly self-destructive and self-defeating and there is plenty of historical evidence to support this view.

Perfectly understandable why you find Trump supporter's winning attitude 'interesting'.
 
View attachment 187150

This is 2017 only. An average of the last 8 years puts US spend at 4.06%. For Germany, that 8 year average is 1.3%.

UsualName will likely point out some technically incorrect data in the tweet, or the fact that it did not mention a time period, etc. That's all he can go for.
We should reduce our spending to the agreed upon 2% and let the Europeans fund their welfare states on the backs of your own tax payers.
 
View attachment 187150

This is 2017 only. An average of the last 8 years puts US spend at 4.06%. For Germany, that 8 year average is 1.3%.

UsualName will likely point out some technically incorrect data in the tweet, or the fact that it did not mention a time period, etc. That's all he can go for.


Not to digress here, just sayin, the U.S knows how to fund organizations that serve as a club for bitching about and colluding against the U.S.

figure-1-average-total-annual-contributions-to-53-multi.png
 
I find liberal psychology, and aptitude, and attitude, incredibly self-destructive and self-defeating and there is plenty of historical evidence to support this view.

Perfectly understandable why you find Trump supporter's winning attitude 'interesting'.

All you have to do is be honest. Do you see an inaccuracy or not. If you do, why didn’t you qualify the tweet with it?
 
Not to digress here, just sayin, the U.S knows how to fund organizations that serve as a club for bitching about and colluding against the U.S.

figure-1-average-total-annual-contributions-to-53-multi.png

The UN should be moved to Saudi Arabia, where it could actually do some good. But, don’t get OptionPro mixed up. NATO a defensive pact (hint, hint OP) and the cornerstone of peace in modern western civilization while the UN is useless outside of the Middle East and Africa.
 
All you have to do is be honest. Do you see an inaccuracy or not. If you do, why didn’t you qualify the tweet with it?
If there is anything blatantly inaccurate then the MSM will pick it up and will be splashing their front pages with it. But it would most likely be by design.

Trump is the master MSM troll, and MSM keeps covering him exactly like he wants to be covered. He gives them so much to 'cover', MSM cannot keep up.

Where is the 'inaccuracy'? And please advice the MSM of it as soon as you can....
 
Back
Top