BTW, just replied to one thread about volumes, and wanted to note here for you as well one thing as long as we are getting familiar with forex and fx brokers:
You all see the banner up there claiming a while ago 1.5 trill, right?
Well, funny thing is that its not 1.5 trill since 2001 - officially. And they were using it up untill recently, before it was posted many times on boards. I dont belive that GAIN and other brokers using 1.5 figure in irder to stress the liquidity of forex didnt know it.
The data we have right now is not upto date. And when someone is pointing out 1.5 trill, the data may be only of october 2001, as thats the latest press release out there. This data (and other statistics on currency and financial direvatives markets) is released by national central banks once in every 3 years. The coordination is made by BIS (bank of international settelments), which is empowered by G10. Last release of 2001 was based on data provided by 48 central banks and monitory authorities.
According to that vary release, volumes on forex market were increasing till 1998 (thats where we had 1.5 figure) and in 2001 - reduced. The fall in volumes occured after the asian crysis. And the main sector of market where the fall occured was the spot market (thats what we are "offered") - take a look 570 bil in 1998, and fell to 390 bill in latest report. So the latest tendency back then was - volumes on spot reducing. We are offerd spot market, and the volume on spot market according to chart was 387 bil/day...Anyways, I dont really get it what's the relevance of liquidity if our trades are not taken out on interbank at all? 100k and 200k contract cannot be traded out there...so whats their story of not revealing the truth and playing theater...? I dont know. Well, I do know - who would trade forex with (lets say) GAIN or FXCM, knowing from the begining those are ones who have to pay you in case you win, and not other market participant...Will they do everything in order you to loose or will they play fair...?

. Let me ask you: would you play fair knowing theres no serious regulation? nope. Especially, when you sign at the begining, that they have no obligation following other price data, and prices they provide are those they are ready to deal at (i.e no interbank/rater/teletrade.dow jones/bloomberg rates).
I think this would lighten enthusiasm of potential clients. As for me, I dont care, and even for beginers I would say not to worry. But I guess for advertizing and promotion it wouldnt be that good...just for you to know.
btw, url of bis
www.bis.org
best regards,
Rezo.