They were forced to withdraw. Which part are you still not understanding of the ruling communique. Stop reading press releases of companies and instead focus on the particulars of the ruling agreement.
Let's be clear here, they agreed to a settlement to exit the U.S. market. A market which they subsequently said was a money loser for them. No-one was "banned", they just agreed to leave to avoid a bigger fine for a market that they'd probably lose money in if they had a regulator looking over their shoulder.