Boy, what a wild ride last Friday, and strong opening today so far. Someone belittled me last week for even setting the 1.25 mark as target and here we are at 1.2440, a day late but nonetheless. So much to smart options players who attached 15/100 to the 1.25 touch. Not that I think it was mis-priced but I just want to take this opportunity to point out the core difference between options plays and pure delta plays. Nobody sane in their head should buy far otm optionality unless he has inside information simply because more often then not the options are relatively efficiently priced.
Even with a strong track record of expressing views on direction the probability of being wrong generally makes paying the theta more expensive than the probability of being right and riding the occasional rally/crash off the back of delta and gamma exposure. I would never buy a 100/15 unless I was convinced the option was grossly mispriced. However, I would very much buy the outright delta with a target equal to the touch level, given I have a very strong view on direction. One reason could be that I believe the market supports at the very least current levels, meaning even it never gets to my target I do not lose a penny vs. the price to pay to be long optionality. Secondly, spreads are far wider on the options side because of their lower liquidity. I pay generally 0.3 pips on the spread and another 0.2-0.3 pips in commission to trade the outright delta in eur. No otc, no listed options would ever get me this cheaply in and out of a trade. The options do not price in the inconvenience and cost to turn around positions a multiple times.
Thus, I stand by my view I expressed last week, but I openly admit I played it pretty badly. Missed the strong selling pressure post ECB press conference and also the rebound later on. Anyone seeing parallels to the crazy volatility we have seen September, October 2008?
Well, new week new opportunities. Let's go get 'em tiger...
P.S.: May I add my read of ECB sentiment after having combed through all the news pieces: I believe the ECB is trying to play a game of chicken here. I sense a strong move towards intervention but the new game in town is the justification for such intervention. Before it was about volatility in the markets ECB attempted to tame, Germany said: NO! Then it was about Greece, then Spanish and Italian yields, Germany said NO! The reasoning for the opposition was that ECB's mendate was not to support market levels of individual nation's bond markets or equity markets. Well, why not just inventing a reason that lies within the ECB mendate that would give it all the justification to do whatever it wants? Here it is:
The newest story is that the ECB needs to defend the Euro and the stance of the non-reversibility of the Euro. Thats why they need to support sovereign spreads. LOL, anyone find that funny with the Euro trading at 1.24 levels against the dollar? First of all, a cheaper euro can only be good for European exports, secondly we are still far away from parity levels where markets would seriously start to question when the currency will be taken off the market and national ccys will be re-introduced. The market doubts the whole Euro experiment because their is no fiscal union behind backing it up, thats the ONLY reason people have no faith in the euro.