Thank you for your kind words!
I don't want to deceive re my discretionary abilities in ES/VXX. They are better traders to learn from when it comes to those instruments.
Val
Back in the day, after reading so many books on trading I felt like often they all follow the same general pattern which leads to predictable emotional cycle. Pattern being - author relates to you with a life story (you’re feeling great), share struggles (holy shit I’m not alone, this guy gets me!), show it can be done (wow! There is hope), get some glimpses into what performance can look like, and then either leave you with
- Smart ass philosophical remarks and “now search for your own edge"
- Signup up for my service and follow signals
- A system rules that never works after you test it
Depending on the quality of a book, within a few days to couple of months I fell back to "I’m completely on own in this and all those guys are crooks realization”
It’s kinda funny, didn’t I just use the same trick to “connect" with readers of this journal? Well, at least I’m not selling anything.
When thinking what would be best topic for my next post I figured there only so much theoretical stuff people can take. So thinking about the struggles I had at the beginning I decided to come up with a tradable system example which, hopefully, can give some folks a breakthrough they need in searching for their edge, consistency and profitability. Or maybe enough hope to keep digging till it's found.
Before that a bit more on my own trading - what I do today is not practical or feasible for 10 mil account. Good news - this is not a problem most of us gonna have for awhile. And this is part of the edge.
Understanding this is critical. For the same reason I’m not sharing any exact rules of my strategies since they rely on pretty small inefficiencies and ability to execute nearly flawlessly. I also developed my own software to harvest them at the fullest and manage risk. My execution edge comparing to anyone else running my strategies is +8.5% annual over average number of trades per year. If it’s a volatile year like this one, just execution edge may become 15% of my profits.
Here is an MR Long strategy I’ve put together this morning. This is not something I personally use but I believe this a good start form someone having no working system and a small trading account. 100-200k USD would be just fine. Besides - lots of my stuff IS MR. Just different rules, short version and multiple versions with variations.
It’s based on Connors RSI. Basic rules are - take SP500 stocks above 5$ and with at least 0.5mil 10d average volume, find oversold ones using CRSI, leave only ones with a strong trend using ADX, rank by a creative formula, leave top 10 and send LMT orders for next day 10% below today’s closing prices. Exit with MOC order when CRSI > 50 or held for 10 days.
This system doesn’t generate too many trades and basically takes everything that is offered at a significant discount on volatile days.
In the graph below you can see few key equity curves. I’ve included SPY with dividends for comparison. Red line is one that a trade with a large account would likely experience trading this system (no compounding). Green - smaller trader having an advantage of getting his small positions filled with high probability using simple LMT orders. Blue or whatever color it is included just for example, since most backtests you see out there will be done assuming compounding.
For 2000-2010 I’ve excluded compounded version and it made too much money and makes everything else look indistinguishable. I’m personably not a big fan of testing with compounding, but I do benefit from it in a live trading.
View attachment 232442
View attachment 232444
View attachment 232438
View attachment 232440
View attachment 232443
View attachment 232439
Advantages of this system:
- It is reasonably simple. Though the ones I use live are ever more simple
- Better than pretty much anything I've seen in books and was able to reproduce myself
- It has “safe” liquidity assumptions for small trades. There is lots of room to go for less liquid stocks if desired. The less liquid the more inefficiencies.
- It has a fixed number of outstanding LMT orders. Which makes it usable by even non mechanical traders and allows for a very safe execution
- Big guys can’t use it as slippage will kill the edge
- It is <10% invested on average and never uses margin. In SPY you would have 100% of your money locked full-time
- It does get destroyed during big market downturns. I’d very suspicious if any MR Long wouldn’t. Max DD certainly needs some work though.
Disadvantages:
Also I'd run it for 1980-2000 period. But I haven't got time for this today.
- It has pretty big max DD during big market downturns. There are many ways to mitigate it. Increasing number or trades, adding short system, positive sizing, different setups ranking, taking less volatile stocks, etc.
- 2010-2014 performance is pretty flat. I’d look into it more
- Max DD duration is more than 1 year on a few occasions. Ideally should be less than a year
The system itself:
View attachment 232441
Val
Hi Val, I have been reading your thread today, and I have some questions. When a buy signal is generated, if tomorrow's price cannot hit 10% lower to fill the buy order, that signal will be removed forever? or the signal stays in the list for the next days? If it is the latter, we might end up with a stream of signals generated on the same stock at different days at different levels.
Thank you for taking the time and opening this interesting thread.
Glad to hear you found it interesting.
I would imagine for most EOD trading systems out there a setup is universally good only for one day. Ultimately you are the architect of your system so it can be any way you want. But that is the way I do it.
If tomorrow your setup occurs again in the same stock then it is on the list again with a new price calculated using updated data.
Normally, "repeat" setups will happen with MR systems. Let's say if stock falls down next day but not enough for you to enter. Then next day you run you scan again to see stocks that have that MR setup and it might very well be there.
I had some instances where a stock not only generated but also hit my entry point 3 days in row, in the same direction... That is not a pretty, but part of the game. You just keep following your system. I don't but some people pyramid and most of the time it will decrease your pain. Till that one time when you can't take the pain any longer and will pull a plug.
When you test your system you can also try to check if you get better results if you don't take a setup which also happened yesterday.
Val
Hey Val, thanks for clarifying things. Your explanation makes the logic pretty understandable. "I don't but some people pyramid and most of the time it will decrease your pain. Till that one time when you can't take the pain any longer and will pull a plug." also reflects the truth of how some people deal with mean-reversion systems. I personally think tight stops harm MR, but some stop or exit criteria must certainly be there, otherwise there is a risk of holding companies that actually never recover back up.
Bests,
I would be curious to read your thoughts about this topic.MR stops/risk is a cool subject, probably deserves a separate post.
I would be curious to read your thoughts about this topic.
Thank you, I appreciate this.Done!