I recall that you had also included a parameter for each instrument where you could set the maximum position size. This can help as well to avoid margin issues. I was too lazy to implement that. I decided that, if need be, I would temporarily fiddle with the instrument weight. Less clean, but with the same outcome. I fiddle with the weight until I
Following this interesting discussion. Insufficient margin is the stuff that would keep me up at night. One thing that I didn’t quite follow is the bit about an override parameter ‘to avoid having to change instrument weights’. In your system GAT, I thought you only changed instrument weights annually? Probably have crossed wires on this...Of course in theory it would be possible to have some kind of optimisation that worried about margin, but that would cause more hassle than it was worth IMHO.
By the way I have a special override parameter which multiples positions to avoid having to change instrument weights; might achieve the same effect but it's cleaner.
Glad to know it's not just me that is having margin issues, although I am curious as to what your funding ratio is given you are the same vol target as me?
GAT