i am still puzzled about this little debate and some logicQuote from JimmyJam:
Pretty much
If the offer were legitimate if would have been made in private.
i still do not get. first what the hell did you think i WAS
offering? i mean i was clear in my post that i did not want
details of his system, so what could my hidden agenda
be? selling a software to a newbie who is struggling
with a single figure account? selling a trading system
to him? where he just experiences the problem of
papertrading versus real i could make him trust my
backtested system? or would i want to sell him
programming hours, though he obviously 1. can
program himself and 2. cannot afford it anyways?
"The fact that it was in public takes away any legitimacy that it has."
excuse me, you are saying in public that you ...
"... think it was bullshit."
and i have to reach out a helping hand in private in
order to be legitimate? as if the very act of helping
was something so much unheard of that in order to
make it gain legitimacy it must be done in private?
"It doesn't effect me one way or the other."
yet you basically claim i am lying though as
far as i know we never had any contact before? if it
does not effect you, then why do you insult someone
for no reason?

