Front Running, Flash Orders, or Blackbox/Algorithmic Manipulation?

Quote from Red_Ink_inc:

Quote from stock777:

so why dont you just trade liquid stocks with penny spreads and 5k or more on each side. There are plenty of those around.

************************************************

Try hitting ORCL with a FOK order for 40k when there's twice that on the level and see how many you get. Every market maker's ECN bid will vanish like a fart in the wind and you'll only hit the retail dummies.

This is a very real problem on all stocks. However the point is moot as it will all cease on Sept 1.

I tested it 10 times today and had problem filling 50k ORCL .

Maybe you're thinking about the 200k share trades .
 
My prev post mistyped, should have said "NO" problem.


Im looking at ORCL now with size on NASDAQ and ARCA as well as others

If you say you cant take that out easily, I say you're full of shit.

What we have here are clowns that have slow quotes, trying to buy or sell in the middle of a huge index move.

Close that Muriel Seibert account and try IB
 
Quote from black diamond:

Hi Pacific7,

I don't have a lot of time now but I will post more later. One quick thing - thanks for the example, that is the kind of thing I was looking for, but I don't see how flash orders could be responsible for this.

The trader's order wasn't a flash order, or at least you didn't say so. Only flash orders get flashed. Subscribers to flash orders get to see flash orders only, they don't get flashed everbody's market orders.

What you are describing is the trader seeing limit orders in the book when he decides to trade that are not there when he actually tries to trade. These are standing limit orders, not flash orders - he can't see those. To me that means the limit orders got cancelled or somebody sent a market order that beat him to them. Maybe limit order cancellation rates went up around the same time flash orders went up, but I can't see the causality there. Algos are known to place and cancel orders frequently, but I don't see how this could be related to the trader's straightforward market order. Maybe he is implying the order cancellations increased because algos are pulling their limit orders in response to other people's flash orders? I guess this is possible but I don't think likely - I'll tell you why in another post.



My pleasure, thanks for bringing it up. Like I said I think this is interesting stuff. But I don't want to act like I am an expert on it, I am just trying to think it through at the same time you are.
_______________________________________________

Black Diamond, just a note;

Called Nadaq, they said all orders sent through them from our computers (at least mine with sterling) can show up as flash orders to others who purchase the flash information, unless your particular broker/dealer has them sent for you using a specifidc strategy. I am assuming that BATS and EDGE work the same way.

Good news is that this whole situation should be fixed on Sept 1st. Guess we all have to wait to see if it has any impact on our individual trading styles...
 
I can see where in theory some of this could be a problem in thin names, but I find it hard to believe that SPY MSFT INTC DELL etc are a problem for the pikers here.

Blocks trade all the time without the price moving at all, so it must all be tape painting just waiting for your huge order to show up, so they can drop the SPY 5 cents on ya. Of course it drops the 5 cents and recovers before any of the other home gamers even see it.

Only you as a home gamer victim know the mugging that has just transpired.
 
Quote from AutoMate:

I posted this in another forum before but I think it bears repeating and is pertinent.

The real heart of the issue isn't High Frequency Trading, it's High Frequency Quoting (HFQ), and High Frequency Front-running (HFF). Flash orders facilitate both. If you are asking yourself wtf is this guy talking about, spend some time actually looking at a level 2 screen and time and sales data.

For a clear example of HFQ take a look at a stock like SPY. All day there are hundreds of thousands of shares up and down the bid/ask and the values change endlessly, for no apparent reason, and you will see levels with a couple of hundred K posted that get flipped with a few thousand maybe 20 K actually printing at that price. What appears to be incredible depth is nothing more than vapor. The vast majority of this quoting is driven by very high powered co-loed boxes operating on fraction of a millisecond timeframes. Does this cause the dreaded 'market manipulation'?Probably not. The prices most likely find thier natural levels, but what it does do is create a very high 'noise' level and a difficulty in getting to the front of the line for execution. I would guess that if the boxes responsible for this quoting were turned off for a day, or even and hour, you would see something dramatically different on stocks like the SPY.

As for the High Frequency Front-running, lol ! Anyone who use EDGE facilites to execute orders against the specialist knows this story all too well. Or for other examples, just take a look at some of the stocks out there where there are huge out-sized EDGE orders posted up and down the bid/ask. The ELP's just fuck with everybody and do what they want with little risk because they get flashed on everything coming through so they can get the hell out of the way in one fuck of a hurry if they need to. Otherwise they just post their size up and down all day jerking everyone off and pushing the stock around with relatively low risk.

If the SEC bans Flash orders, the game won't change, just the tactics. There is too much $$$ invested in serious technology on all sides and too many egg-heads employed figuring out new and creative ways to use it.

Guys like Red Ink know exactly how this works. He executes trades in lots I would guess most here don't do in a day. And as he said when u try to get fills like 40+ k in one shot, even on apparently liquid stocks, you need to be smart. You are never fast enough! The guys with a vested interest (GS, Citadel, and many other funds engaging in HFT) are so far ahead of you that worrying about latency on your piss ant business internet connection is a total wate of time. This whole game is an arms race, and the vast majority of us discussing this subject are like Botswana.

It may sound distasteful but, you need to trade like a terrorist. Understand you are out gunned on the conventional front and look to exploit the weaknesses of the HFT/HFQ algos.

Good thread. Far better than 99% of the shite scribbled on this site each and every day. I always find it interesting that the best posts are written by those who have an average posting rate of <200 per year. Could it be that these people are actually proper traders as opposed to the muppets that crank up 1000+ posts each year?

Anyway, Automate makes an excellent point here. Banning flash orders won't change anything. The tactics may change but the end result will be the same. Co-location and sub-millisecond response times are here to stay. As retail you cannot play this game so why bother trying. Think about the issue from the perspective of an HFT algo programmer. What criteria would you use as a trigger? Then have a think about designing your execution strategy so that it attempts not to set off these triggers.

For what it's worth, I primarily trade Globex instruments these days. On the whole I think the futures markets experience much less of these shenanigans and tomfoolery.
 
Thats right. Its the reason 87% of ES traders are profitable.

As for light posters, mostly they are busy with handling margin calls, so their time is limited.
 
Quote from stock777:

Thats right. Its the reason 87% of ES traders are profitable.

As for light posters, mostly they are busy with handling margin calls, so their time is limited.

To clarify stock777, that wasn't meant as a dig at you personally. You are in the minority of high volume posters and have brought up an interesting topic here. I was refering to the plethora of posters who fill this site each and every day with reams of inconsequential ramblings and nonsense.

All I was trying to say is that it is possible to ride on the coattails of the HFT algos if you understand how they work.
 
Quote from ScoobyStoo:

To clarify stock777, that wasn't meant as a dig at you personally. You are in the minority of high volume posters and have brought up an interesting topic here. I was refering to the plethora of posters who fill this site each and every day with reams of inconsequential ramblings and nonsense.

All I was trying to say is that it is possible to ride on the coattails of the HFT algos if you understand how they work.


algos have been missing in the small/mid cap space for almost a year now!!
 
Quote from pacific7:

_______________________________________________

Black Diamond, just a note;

Called Nadaq, they said all orders sent through them from our computers (at least mine with sterling) can show up as flash orders to others who purchase the flash information, unless your particular broker/dealer has them sent for you using a specifidc strategy. I am assuming that BATS and EDGE work the same way.

Good news is that this whole situation should be fixed on Sept 1st. Guess we all have to wait to see if it has any impact on our individual trading styles...

Anyone doubting the frustration of the OP probably hasn't traded stocks recently. You see a stock bid 10.20 ask 10.23. You send it an order to buy 5000 shares @ 10.25. All of a sudden the new bid becomes 10.26, and you do not get a fill (not even 100 shares - the minimum ask size). If it happens 1% of the time, you would think it was coincidence - the quotes are stale or got cancelled- but when it happens 98% of the time, it is clear some legalized front-running is taking place. I used to think my broker was in collusion with market centers, but from all the discussion here and elsewhere it is clear it is the HFT and undue advantage given the big players. For most fairly liquid stocks (trading say $20million worth of shares a day), I have to enter my limit order (crossing the market), cancel and enter again several times before getting a complete fill.
 
I don't trade that block size as a rule, but I find it hard to believe this can be happening routinely.

I'd have to see an actual L2 snapshot of this and the context before I take these claims seriously.

So far there has not been one piece of hard evidence in the form of a screen shot or time and sales.

I watch t&s all the time on many stocks, and I do NOT see this bullshit happening. I see size displayed and taken.

if you claim to have seen little green men, the least you can do is provide pictures.,
 
Back
Top